Crowell & Moring Blasted Over Fees Clause In Walgreens Suit

By Ryan Boysen · June 7, 2023, 5:00 PM EDT

A D.C. federal judge tore into Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys at a Wednesday hearing, demanding to know why she wasn't told about contractual language that seemingly means Crowell & Moring...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Case Information

Case Title

WALGREEN CO. v. HUMANA HEALTH PLAN, INC. et al

Case Number

Court

District Of Columbia

Nature of Suit

Arbitration

Date Filed

February 04, 2022

Recent Articles By Ryan

April 26, 2024
Latham, Akin Beat NJ Suit Over Alleged IP Theft Scheme
April 17, 2024
Ga. Justices To Examine 'Actual Malice' In Atty's Libel Case
January 05, 2024
Latham Denies Exploiting Texas Judge Scandal For Fees
December 01, 2023
Former Clerks Say Justice O'Connor Still Worth Emulating
November 07, 2023
How Law Firms Build And Protect Stellar Reputations
July 19, 2023
Out Of Prison, Ex-El Paso Judge Wants His Law License Back
July 03, 2023
The Funniest Moments Of The Supreme Court Term
June 13, 2023
Crowell & Moring Exiting Walgreens Suit Over Conflict Claims
June 01, 2023
DC Judge Rips Crowell Attys Over Walgreens-Humana Fight
May 22, 2023
Walgreens Says Crowell 'Betrayal' Led To $642M Humana Win