Calif. Clarifies Class Burdens In Post-Prop 64 Suit

Law360, New York (May 15, 2009, 12:00 AM ET) -- The California Supreme Court ruled Monday that private class action representatives must prove injury-in-fact to bring claims under the state's Unfair Competition Law, striking down defendants' arguments that each individual class member must meet standing requirements set by electorate initiative Proposition 64.

In a 4-3 ruling, the high court held that a trial court had erred in disbanding a 2001 class seeking damages from nine major tobacco companies — including Philip Morris USA Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. — over allegedly misleading advertisements questioning the...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already a subscriber?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

Required