Court Finds SRAM Plaintiffs Violated Discovery Order

By Brendan Pierson

Law360, New York (May 21, 2009, 12:00 AM ET) -- The judge overseeing multidistrict litigation over antitrust allegations in the static random access memory industry has adopted a special master's finding that a proposed class of indirect purchaser plaintiffs committed discovery violations, and has imposed limits on the evidence the plaintiffs can use in the future.

Judge Claudia Wilken of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday adopted a report by a special master finding that the indirect purchaser plaintiffs had not disclosed all of the information two of their expert...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  5. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles