Implications Of In Re Washington Mutual Inc.

Law360, New York (December 23, 2009, 2:24 PM ET) -- In a recent decision, In re Washington Mutual Inc., et al., 2009 WL 4363539 (Bankr. D.Del. 2009), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that a group of noteholders was subject to the disclosure requirements of Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure because it was acting as an ad hoc committee representing more than one creditor.

The court also stated, in dicta, that such a group may owe “some obligation” to other members of the same class of creditors even though...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  5. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles