Daubert And Damages Experts Post-Uniloc

Law360, New York (September 9, 2011, 2:55 PM EDT) -- In the wake of the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Uniloc USA Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.,[1] which rejected, as unreliable, the "25-percent rule" of thumb for patent reasonable royalty calculation, there has been ever-increasing emphasis on Daubert[2] challenges to patent damages expert testimony. It is apparent that district courts are being called upon to impose greater "gate keeper" scrutiny regarding both the reliability of the theoretical underpinnings of damages expert testimony and the tethering, vel non, of the damages analysis to the facts of the case....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!