Insurer Can't Escape Mental Health Parity Suit

Law360, New York (May 02, 2013, 3:47 PM ET) -- In a decision hailed by mental health advocates, a Vermont federal judge on Tuesday preserved much of a New York woman's suit alleging her employer's health plan improperly restricted psychiatric treatments more than traditional medical care, saying the insurer failed to show it acted in an even-handed manner.

U.S. District Judge Christina Reiss, after reviewing the terms and conditions of Fletcher Allen Health Care Inc.'s plan, found that the documents don't yield an "unambiguous conclusion that a disparity does or does not exist." As a result,...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers


Case Information

Case Title

M. v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc. et al

Case Number




Nature of Suit

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.


Christina Reiss

Date Filed

May 21, 2012


Law Firms Mentioned

Companies Mentioned