When Hindsight Is Not 20/20 In Purchase Price Disputes

Law360, New York (May 13, 2015, 4:12 PM EDT) -- Hindsight, renowned for perfect clarity or being "20/20" when one looks back at a forecasted event with the benefit of knowing its outcome, was the subject of our analysis, and our quantitative findings were found to yield results that were closer to 40 percent/60 percent[1]. Though not interpreted as being determinative in the context of resolving post-closing purchase price disputes, we found that the consideration of evidence learned in hindsight and introduced into closing working capital arbitration proceedings by the parties was indicated as being considered in about 40 percent of the matters/claims we analyzed. This should be somewhat of a surprise to other accounting experts as it was to us who practice this specialty. But more importantly, it may suggest some very useful planning insight for party advisers....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!