Nautilus Falsely Marked Exercise Equipment: Judge

Law360, New York (February 10, 2012, 8:55 PM ET) -- A Virginia federal judge on Friday found that, as Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates Inc. alleged, fitness equipment maker Nautilus Inc. had falsely marked its unpatented exercise machines, but refused to rule that the equipment manufacturer did so with an intent to deceive.

U.S. District Judge James C. Turk partially granted a motion for summary judgment filed by SCSRA and founder Ponani Sukumar, finding Nautilus had falsely marked unpatented strength and cardio machines.

“Even a cursory review of the evidence reveals that none of the ......
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required

Case Information

Case Title

Ponani Sukumar et al v. Nautilus, Inc.

Court

Virginia Western

Nature of Suit

Patent

Case Number

7:11-cv-00218

Judge

James C. Turk

Date Filed

May 9, 2011

Sections

Law Firms Mentioned

Companies Mentioned