Law360, New York (September 24, 2009) -- There is little question that KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.[1] raised the bar for establishing the nonobviousness of an invention as required for patentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
It is well known that the Supreme Court in KSR rejected a rigid application of the Federal Circuit’s TSM test[2] and reiterated that the four-factor analysis of Graham v. John...
