As a young lawyer in the Office of the Independent Counsel, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh didn't hold back when marking up his colleagues' legal filings, documents released Monday indicate.
The New Jersey Appellate Division ruled Friday that the bond between a child and his gay parent’s partner constitutes the familial relationship needed to support an emotional distress claim stemming from a death, issuing a published decision that revived a case against the city of Trenton over a toddler who was fatally struck by a truck.
The D.C. Circuit on Friday threw out the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 20-month delay of the effective date of an Obama-era chemical disaster rule written in the aftermath of fatal industrial accidents, saying the federal government’s actions “make a mockery of the statute.”
A candidate for district attorney in Maine lost a wide-ranging suit on Thursday in the state’s high court against bar officials and others over the suspension of his license, even as he faced possible disbarment and an ex-client who says he assaulted her.
The Sixth Circuit on Thursday revived a sales worker’s pregnancy and pay bias suit that was filed despite her having agreed to waive legal claims on her last day of work, ruling Title VII and Equal Pay Act claims are not subject to a common law doctrine governing whether contracts signed under duress can be revoked.
A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit rejected an effort by investors in two so-called feeder funds that were linked to Bernie Madoff’s fraudulent investment scheme to revive their class action against the funds’ managers, auditors, consultant and administrator, ruling Friday that a lower judge was right to dismiss the case.
The Federal Circuit on Friday upheld a decision to toss the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe’s suit seeking $200 million from the federal government for allegedly mismanaging the tribe’s water, saying the tribe hadn’t shown that the government had hurt the tribe’s ability to get the water needed for its South Dakota reservation.
The Sixth Circuit revived a Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action brought over spam faxes sent to a car compressor company by a finance company that targeted manufacturers, ruling that a reasonable juror could find that the ads were sent "on behalf of" the financial firm.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court on Friday affirmed that Wells Fargo Financial Massachusetts Inc. could not use its own contract concerns and an uptick in litigation challenging dispossessions to get the court's hypothetical blessing to foreclose on homeowners before actually attempting to evict them.
A parent does not need to be joined as a party in a civil custody action that includes a bid for certain immigration findings for the case to proceed in California, as long as the individual received adequate notice of the proceedings, the state's highest court ruled on Thursday.
A Sixth Circuit panel on Thursday resurrected Kyocera Corp.'s attempt to nix what it says is a coercive provision in its supply contract for material used in solar panels that requires it to pay for the material even if it chooses not to buy any.
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to find that a Native American tribe should be subject to the state of Washington's fuel tax when importing that product onto its reservation.
Documents recently turned over to the Senate Judiciary Committee indicate that Judge Brett Kavanaugh “misled” lawmakers during his 2006 confirmation hearing for the D.C. Circuit judgeship about his knowledge of the Bush administration’s torture policies, top Senate Democrats alleged Thursday.
No one is tracking law students with disabilities to see where the education system may be failing them, but some advocates are working to change this dynamic and build a better pipeline.
The Eleventh Circuit handed a group of Jefferson County, Alabama, sewer ratepayers a loss Thursday when it ruled that equitable mootness applies to Chapter 9 bankruptcy and extinguished their appeal of a bankruptcy confirmation plan for the county.
Following a rehearing, a Texas appellate court revived a suit accusing Houston Methodist Hospital of being responsible for injuries a woman suffered after her artery was nicked during a liver biopsy, saying Thursday the patient’s medical expert reports were flawed but potentially fixable.
The full Federal Circuit on Thursday agreed to consider whether the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has wrongly excluded “blue water” Navy veterans from benefits related to exposure to the notorious defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War, roughly a decade after a court panel had backed the agency's stance.
The Eighth Circuit struck a blow Thursday to Medtronic Inc. in its $1.36 billion dispute with the Internal Revenue Service, vacating a favorable U.S. Tax Court decision after finding that the judge in the case had not justified the pricing.
Two tax organizations filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court Thursday, urging the court to find that a Native American tribe should be subject to the state of Washington’s fuel tax when operating outside its reservation.
A Texas appeals court has handed a win to Hunt Petroleum Corp. heir Albert G. Hill III, ruling the trial court in his mortgage fraud case was within its discretion to compel the then-district attorney to testify and to dismiss the case with prejudice after he refused.
Mississippi's highest court has refused to entertain Google's challenge to a ruling that kept alive a suit lodged by the state's attorney general over the tech giant's allegedly unlawful collection and use of public school students’ personal information, a conclusion that was met with opposition by the court's chief justice.
As the D.C. Circuit judge makes his bid for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, here’s our look at the politics and predictions surrounding the nomination along with what a Justice Brett Kavanaugh could mean for your practice.
The latest term ended with a bang with Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement, but the cases themselves packed a punch this term. With the Supreme Court back at full strength, the docket was loaded with issues that divided the nine justices. Here, Law360 takes a look at the oddest voting lineups, the juiciest dissents and the best oral argument moments from a contentious session.
With more judicial vacancies at the start of his term than any president in the past three decades, President Donald Trump has an unusual opportunity to reshape the federal judiciary. Here is Law360's comprehensive guide to the nominations.
Across the country this fall, recent law school graduates, law firm associates and experienced professionals will interview for positions in private practice and government service. Sharing tips on how to stand out in this high-pressure, hypercompetitive process are Eileen Decker, former U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, and Keith Jacoby, co-chairman of Littler Mendelson PC’s class action practice group.
In Trump v. Hawaii, the U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld President Donald Trump’s so-called travel ban against the contention that it is anti-Muslim and violates the establishment clause. However, it appears that some lower federal courts have not understood the high court's message, says Steven Gordon of Holland & Knight LLP.
Now that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has allowed the state Superior Court's decision in Chevalier v. General Nutrition Centers to be appealed, it is possible that the fluctuating workweek method — an alternative for employers to calculate overtime pay for salaried employees — could be explicitly adopted in the state, says Jeffrey Cadle of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP.
Soon the Texas Supreme Court will consider under what circumstances Glassdoor should be compelled to reveal the identities of anonymous reviewers. Skadden attorneys Margaret Krawiec and Thomas Parnham discuss how courts over the years have answered the fundamental First Amendment question of whether to unmask an internet user who chooses to speak anonymously.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the U.S. Supreme Court 25 years ago and is not planning to retire anytime soon — she has hired clerks through 2020. What's it like to assist Justice Ginsburg? In this series, former clerks reflect on the experience.
On July 24, a Ninth Circuit panel applied textualist reasoning in Young v. Hawaii to secure a right for individuals to carry firearms in public. To end the gun epidemic — demonstrated in Chicago recently with 74 people shot in one weekend — it’s past time to turn a spotlight on the root cause: legal carelessness and oversights of text, says Robert W. Ludwig of the American Enlightenment Project.
In what may be one of his final acts on the D.C. Circuit, Judge Brett Kavanaugh has written an opinion that may strengthen attorney-client privilege over communications between a company and its in-house counsel. Attorneys at DLA Piper discuss what this holding could mean for the future of the privilege and offer advice for current in-house counsel.
With its recent decision in Rayner v. E-Trade Financial — which unanimously affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action asserting state law best execution violations — the Second Circuit made a significant contribution to a collection of circuit court opinions on the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, say attorneys with Paul Hastings LLP.
It had never occurred to me that judges don’t always love the way their appellate cousins review their work and tell them — in public — all the things they got wrong. I was frequently struck by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s acute awareness of the delicacy of this relationship, says attorney David Post.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch's opinion in Epic Systems v. Lewis employed the same analytics used by Justice Antonin Scalia in three previous decisions. They strongly suggest the court would allow a mandatory arbitration clause with a class action waiver in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act context, says James Baker of Baker McKenzie.