Profs Dispute Evidence Of Bias By SEC In-House Judges

Law360 (March 6, 2018, 9:31 PM EST) -- An amicus brief filed by a pair of professors in a U.S. Supreme Court case that will decide whether SEC administrative law judges are constitutional says there is no hard evidence that the judges are biased toward rulings that favor the agency, but other legal experts say the question of bias is beside the point.

The brief, filed last week on behalf of Georgetown law professor Urska Velikonja and Stanford law professor Joseph A. Grundfest, claims to refute earlier research cited by the petitioners in Lucia...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.