Considering Kisor's Deference Decision In The Tax Context

By Andrew Roberson (June 27, 2019, 6:27 PM EDT) -- On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Kisor v. Wilkie,[1] substantially restricting the scope of Auer deference.[2] The opinion is sharply divided; Justice Elena Kagan wrote an opinion that commanded a majority only in part. There are three additional concurring opinions. Much ink could be spilled going into the details of each opinion, but the following analysis focuses on the potential impact of the majority opinion on future tax cases....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!