Ambiguous Regulation May Not Preclude FCA Liability

By Michael Prendergast and Jerome Hoffman (June 22, 2017, 1:34 PM EDT) -- A recent appellate court ruling governing all federal court cases in Florida, Georgia and Alabama establishes that a defendant in a False Claims Act case cannot rely on a defense that there was no intent to defraud the government just because the defendant had a reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous government regulation. While the case involved a health care employer's alleged violation of Medicare regulations, the court's decision could apply to anyone required to certify their compliance with federal regulations when billing the government....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!