California, the nation’s most populous state, would require out-of-state retailers with $500,000 of annual sales into the state to collect and remit sales and use tax, according to draft legislation circulated by the administration and obtained by Law360 on Thursday.
A California federal judge has awarded StubHub a win over allegations it flouted the Defend Trade Secrets Act when it hired three employees from a startup company who allegedly used proprietary data from their former company in apps they developed for the online ticket vendor.
The City Council of Chula Vista, California, unanimously approved a resolution memorializing its support for a $3.50 rental car fee imposed by the San Diego Port District challenged by Hertz, Enterprise and the San Diego airport authority.
A coalition of states led by Idaho has thrown its support behind a moose hunter’s U.S. Supreme Court appeal of a Ninth Circuit ruling that held the National Park Service has the right to enforce its hovercraft ban on an Alaska river.
A California federal judge issued a findings of fact order that favored Ugg maker Deckers Outdoor Corp. following a $5.2 million verdict that held Romeo and Juliette Inc. liable for infringing two design patents.
General Motors has successfully contained to California a proposed nationwide class action accusing it of selling Cadillacs with faulty headlights, after a federal judge ruled the federal warranty law the consumers were bringing their claims under didn't apply to drivers outside the state.
The Ninth Circuit said Thursday the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must ban a pesticide linked to developmental harm in children, slamming the agency for allegedly dragging its feet on a product that its own analysis found has an exposure risk that does not meet the relevant safety standard.
A California judge has refused a whistleblower’s request to scrap an allegedly inadequate $1.57 million award he received in his case against a Dell Technologies subsidiary, despite claims that the arbitrator unfairly excluded evidence and was biased because one of his JAMS colleagues once represented the company while at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
A California federal judge said Wednesday that the company behind Snapchat cannot appeal his denial of its bid to dismiss a lawsuit alleging it misled investors about competition and the growth of its user base in the run-up to its initial public offering, saying the company failed to meet the “heavy burden” to justify the appeal.
A California federal judge certified two classes of All Nippon Airways passengers in multidistrict litigation alleging that major airlines conspired to fix the prices of long-distance trans-Pacific flights.
Nissan North America Inc. asked a California federal judge on Wednesday to compel individual arbitration for one of the named plaintiffs in a putative class action alleging the carmaker sold vehicles with defective panoramic sunroofs, saying she signed a broad arbitration agreement when she purchased her vehicle.
The wife of the late N.W.A. member Eazy-E and his son have agreed to settle a lawsuit in California federal court over the use of “Straight Outta Compton” and other phrases associated with the rap group.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said female employees at a San Diego-area country club were subjected to ongoing sexual harassment by a manager who gave preferential treatment to those who accepted his advances, according to a complaint filed in California federal court.
The Makah Indian tribe has further urged the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision that handed a win to two other Washington state tribes in a dispute over tribal fishing grounds, saying the opposing tribes have tried to “trivialize the practical significance of this case.”
A trade group that advocates for affordable housing in Southern California filed suit against Beverly Hills in California federal court on Wednesday, alleging that the city's new rent stabilization ordinance improperly requires property owners to turn over sensitive personal information about tenants.
Emergent BioSolutions Inc. on Thursday said it has agreed to acquire a specialty vaccine company from Cerberus Capital Management LP and Ignition Growth Capital for $270 million, in a deal that was guided by Covington & Burling LLP.
A California federal judge on Wednesday trimmed $2 million from a jury’s $6.5 million wrongful death award in a suit that accused a Sacramento County sheriff’s deputy of fatally shooting an unarmed schizophrenic man, saying the death of the man’s father during trial warranted the reduction.
A California federal court on Wednesday granted a Mexican hotel chain's request to force Facebook Inc. to disclose the identity of a user who used the social media platform to make allegedly defamatory statements about the hotel group, prompting national media attention and economic losses.
Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP urged a California appeals court Wednesday to find it doesn’t owe a legal recruiter $335,000 for connecting the firm with its now managing partner-elect, arguing a jury found the recruiter didn’t fulfill his deal with Manatt and there was no evidence that was the firm’s fault.
A Ninth Circuit panel has backed a lower court's decision to nix an antitrust suit by beer drinkers that challenged Anheuser-Busch InBev's acquisition of SABMiller, finding Wednesday that because SAB had divested its U.S. business before the deal went through, there had been no change to competition in the domestic market.
As we reflect on the five years since Detroit’s bankruptcy filing, Pennsylvania’s experience in intervening in its municipalities’ financial distress provides some useful insights on the problems plaguing municipalities as well as lessons for states, says professor Juliet Moringiello of Widener University Commonwealth Law School.
The California Consumer Privacy Act, passed last month, is the state's most comprehensive privacy legislation to date, but not its first. Several recent putative class actions allege violations of California’s Shine the Light law. Retailers' in-house counsel should ensure that protocols are in place for timely, accurate responses to information requests under the law, say attorneys with Steptoe & Johnson LLP.
As new communications platforms displace email, the legal industry is awkwardly grappling with complex e-discovery questions. Fortunately, this environment provides a very fertile ground of incentives for innovation in both e-discovery technology and service offerings, says Thomas Bonk of Epiq.
Michigan has taken a very aggressive approach to addressing municipal fiscal insolvency. But the state's emergency manager law fails to consider the unintended consequences of short-term financial adjustments, as seen in the case of Flint, say Eric Scorsone and Samantha Zinnes of Michigan State University.
Notwithstanding the latest salary war among prominent law firms, I urge my middle-aged and older colleagues to help the recent graduates we know focus on the long term. Even if the salary is the same, there is a big difference between an institutional firm and the relatively younger firms matching BigLaw, says J.B. Heaton, a University of Chicago business law fellow and former partner at Bartlit Beck.
Earlier this month, the California Supreme Court ruled in Hassell v. Bird that Yelp could not be ordered to remove negative reviews of a law firm that were found to be defamatory. While the decision is a victory for internet platforms and websites, the scope of immunity under the Communications Decency Act has not been fully drawn out, says Pooja Nair of TroyGould PC.
This article by attorneys at Reed Smith LLP outlines tax implications for the cannabis industry in California, the largest state to legalize medical and recreational adult-use cannabis, and other states where marijuana is legally sold.
Some distressed municipalities — including Atlantic City, New Jersey, and Hartford, Connecticut — have recently restructured outside of Chapter 9, through legislation and negotiations. But such fixes are intensely political in nature and are entirely dependent on the will of government officials, say Lawrence Larose and Samuel Kohn of Norton Rose Fulbright.
Law professor Nathalie Martin's new book, "Lawyering From the Inside Out: Learning Professional Development Through Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence," can be of value to any lawyer aiming to achieve greater productivity, relieve the stress of the legal profession and focus on goals, says U.S. District Chief Judge Denise Page Hood of the Eastern District of Michigan.
The U.S. Supreme Court's recent NIFLA v. Becerra decision turned on whether “crisis pregnancy centers” that steer pregnant women away from abortion can be required to provide certain information. The majority ruled in defense of the free speech rights of anti-abortion speakers, but the case makes it less tenable for the court to treat abortion providers differently, says Amy Myrick of the Center for Reproductive Rights.