A California judge on Tuesday shut down Disney’s attempt to trim a lawsuit accusing the studio of failing to pay the producer of “Turner & Hooch” a fair share of the film’s profits, finding that business violations and intentional interference claims aren’t moot despite a recently completed audit.
California and New Mexico on Monday urged a Wyoming federal judge to deny a bid by several other states and industry groups to undo the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s rule aimed at limiting the release of methane from drilling operations on federal and Native American lands.
A California federal judge on Monday refused to dismiss Electronic Arts Inc. from a retired NFL player's putative class action alleging the game maker improperly used their likenesses in Madden video games, saying a recent Ninth Circuit decision EA based its motion on did not preempt the players’ right of publicity claims under the Copyright Act.
Opposing experts testified Monday about the mental health of a doctor claiming she was legally insane at the time she and her surgeon boyfriend allegedly committed health care fraud and money laundering as the California federal trial wound down, setting the stage for closing arguments to begin Tuesday.
We asked, and you answered. Here are the results of Law360’s inaugural survey on third-party legal funding.
Once a taboo topic in the halls of BigLaw, litigation finance is winning over converts. And the peer pressure is building for rival law firms to join the bandwagon.
They often don’t know exactly what they’re buying, and there’s an ever-present chance they could come up empty in a given case. Here’s why investors are flocking to litigation finance anyway.
A California federal jury on Friday found in favor of San Diego Comic Convention when it ruled that a rival event in Utah infringed its valid trademarks related to “comic-con,” setting the stage for the long-running Southern California pop culture event to seek a permanent injunction to prevent future usage.
Facebook asked a California federal judge Friday to grant it a quick win on jurisdictional grounds in a suit brought by users accusing the social media giant of unlawfully storing their facial scans without permission.
Less than a year into its existence, Los Angeles litigation boutique Pierce Sergenian LLP has been renamed Pierce Burns LLP after two members split to form their own boutique as a result of a clash between the original name partners over their long-term visions, Law360 has learned.
A former Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP partner skipped out on $140,000 in legal fees owed to Los Angeles-based boutique Brown Neri Smith & Khan LLP for an elderly abuse case, according to a state court suit filed Friday that said the former partner had even praised the boutique’s work with some freshly baked bread.
The former owner of defunct home builder Dunmore Homes Inc. has been hit with an order in a California federal court directing him to cough up millions of dollars that he allegedly has stashed overseas in order to satisfy a $16 million judgment Travelers won in a bond insurance suit.
A California appeals court ruled Monday that Apple Inc. investors who tried to update their suit against company board members over their role in a Silicon Valley recruiting scandal had to show that it would be futile to ask Apple's current board to take action, rather than the board in place when the suit was first filed.
The Ninth Circuit’s chief judge said Monday the court would be “absolutely flooded with appeals” if it sided with the U.S. Department of Justice and reversed an Oregon federal judge's ruling that gave 21 children a green light to sue the executive branch for allegedly endangering them and future generations with policies that contribute to climate change.
UnitedHealth Group Inc. on Friday urged a California federal court to scrap a False Claims Act suit claiming the insurer overcharged Medicare by submitting information that made patients seem sicker than they were, arguing the federal government knew about submission errors but didn’t consider them important.
Volkswagen AG and Bosch on Friday asked a California federal court to ax claims by a proposed class of drivers who offloaded their diesel cars before the diesel emissions scandal broke in September 2015, saying they didn’t suffer a loss in retail value for their vehicles.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday said it had shut down a $15 million initial coin offering for a California-based online food review company because the digital tokens being sold to investors had not been registered with the commission.
A California federal court on Monday approved a deal between the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and an investigative journalist suing under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the details of what allowed a former Irish Olympic swim team coach accused of sexual assault to immigrate to the United States.
A dozen states and the AFL-CIO threw their support behind the city of Seattle on Friday, telling the Ninth Circuit that a local ordinance allowing Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize should be upheld because it’s covered by state-action immunity and doesn’t violate federal antitrust law.
A group of refugees and immigrants and a social services organization on Friday amended a putative class action in California federal court to challenge President Donald Trump’s third travel ban, saying it is yet another attempt to target Muslims.
A federal judge in New Jersey recently granted summary judgment to drug manufacturers in a lawsuit alleging that Plavix caused gastrointestinal bleeding. The multidistrict litigation court, sitting in New Jersey, applied California's learned intermediary doctrine, but may not have reached the same conclusion had it applied New Jersey law, say Stefanie Colella-Walsh and Martin Schrama of Stark & Stark.
The past several years have been particularly active in the California Legislature, in both creating new rights and responsibilities under state employment law and amending and expanding existing workplace mandates. The 2017 legislative session was no different, and brought about some considerable changes that will dramatically affect many employers’ practices, say attorneys with Reed Smith LLP.
As signaled by its continued extension and expansion of its Geographic Targeting Program, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network will keep the high-end real estate industry firmly in its crosshairs, and may target additional segments of the U.S. real estate sector next, say John Rollins and Ahmed Eltamami of Stout Risius Ross LLC.
Following the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in TDY Holdings v. U.S., government contractors and others whose property and equipment was used to support wartime production should be aware of several factors that could determine whether you obtain significant Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act contribution from the federal government, say Thomas Dimond and Kelsey Weyhing of Ice Miller LLP.
Having just completed a six-year term as chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, I read Yale Law School professor James Forman's new book, "Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America," with particular interest, says Judge Patti Saris, chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Though the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act does not provide a private right of action, a recent spate of consumer class actions have attempted to use the law as a predicate for asserting violations of common law privacy-related torts and various state consumer protection statutes, say attorneys at DLA Piper LLP.
Recently there has been significant attention around new laws and ordinances that prohibit employers from asking job applicants about their salary history in various U.S. states and cities. But are employers outside of these jurisdictions free to ask for salary history information of applicants without risk? Hardly, say Joseph Kroeger and Audrey Roberts of Snell & Wilmer LLP.
The Ninth Circuit's recent anti-SLAPP ruling in Jordan-Benel v. Universal City Studios is the most significant decision of the past decade in the field of idea theft litigation in California, say Glen Kulik and Patricia Brum of Kulik Gottesman Siegel & Ware LLP.
On the heels of the new Insurance Data Security Model Law recently adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, members of Mayer Brown explain the new law, its substantive requirements, and the takeaways for the insurance industry.
When defending claims involving Medicare, it is important to consider whether they may be preempted by state or local laws. An Illinois federal court's recent decision in Mayberry v. Walgreens highlights just how far Medicare preemption can reach, say attorneys with Ropes & Gray LLP.