A California judge on Thursday tentatively ruled that an entrepreneur who won $25.25 million at trial for his work on Beats Electronics LLC’s first headphones is entitled to roughly $5.6 million in prejudgment interest, and said that he will likely award attorneys’ fees in the future.
A California federal judge on Thursday approved a $3.5 million deal DuPont and other companies reached to end consumer claims they conspired to fix a paint ingredient’s price, calling it “in the best interest of the class” since the Third Circuit affirmed DuPont’s win in a similar case.
No one is tracking law students with disabilities to see where the education system may be failing them, but some advocates are working to change this dynamic and build a better pipeline.
Ancestry.com sought to nix allegations it infringed 23andMe Inc.’s technique for determining whether two customers are related by comparing DNA samples, telling a California federal judge Thursday that the patent is invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice standard because it’s not inventive and relies on natural phenomenon.
A California federal judge culled most of the Federal Trade Commission's $4 billion false advertising suit against DirecTV on Thursday, ruling that the agency didn't have evidence strong enough to meet the "extraordinary ambition" of showing that over 40,000 ads deceived consumers.
A California federal judge appeared unswayed Thursday by SAP America Inc. and HP Inc.’s arguments that a software company hasn't met the stringent pleading standards required under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Twombly decision, saying Twombly has created more work than it’s saved, and "you get to the point where we’re wasting time and resources when you know what their pleading is."
A partner at Sidley Austin LLP will be nominated as U.S. attorney in San Francisco, the White House announced Thursday, as it also revealed nominees for spots in Florida, Illinois and North Dakota.
Indirect purchasers who allege a slew of battery makers engaged in price-fixing lithium ion batteries told a California federal court on Wednesday that Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., NEC Tokin Corp. and Toshiba Corp. have agreed to settle their multidistrict litigation claims for a total of $43.5 million.
A California federal judge has pared down a proposed class action alleging Wells Fargo unfairly withholds certain lines of credit from customers because of their immigration status, finding that two of the people bringing the case failed to show they were prevented from taking out home and auto loans because of discriminatory policies.
The Ninth Circuit ruled Thursday that a district court erred when it dismissed as unripe a proposed class action from teachers claiming that interest was wrongly skimmed from their retirement accounts, holding that the precedential test used by the lower court didn’t apply.
A California federal judge on Thursday gave final approval to a $115 million deal that ends claims Anthem Inc. put 79 million consumers’ personal information at risk in a 2015 data breach, casting aside calls for the settlement to go even further to punish the nation’s second-largest health insurer.
The owner of a Kansas-based aromatherapy fashion business has filed a proposed class action suit in California federal court against Facebook alleging the social media giant grossly inflates so-called potential-reach demographic figures that dictate advertising rates and guide clients in choosing what markets in which to place their ads.
The Executive Office for Immigration Review announced Thursday that it has appointed 23 new immigration judges, bringing the total count to 351 nationwide, amid the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to reduce the significant backlog of open cases.
A class of Bank of America NA customers won final approval Thursday for their $1.8 million Fair Credit Reporting Act settlement over allegedly unauthorized soft credit report inquiries, with a California federal judge saying that though it offered a small $4 payout per class member, the deal was fair.
A California jury’s decision last week to award a retired groundskeeper $289 million against Monsanto in a Roundup cancer trial is certain to unleash a torrent of new litigation against the agri-giant, experts tell Law360, and the massive award for a product with “potential risks” could spur failure-to-warn litigation more broadly.
Panasonic Corp. and Sanyo Electric Co. have asked a California federal court to let them out of indirect purchasers' claims in multidistrict litigation over alleged lithium ion battery price-fixing, arguing that the consumers had provided no evidence that they paid unfairly spiked prices for batteries sold by the companies.
Buchalter PC’s Los Angeles office has added two new attorneys as shareholders, one from Clark & Trevithick AP and one from Rimon Law, entering the firm’s corporate and litigation practice groups, respectively.
Environmentalists have urged the Ninth Circuit to revive their lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Marine Fisheries Service that had alleged the federal entities failed to properly protect at-risk fish that live near two dams in the northern part of California.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Patrick DiDomenico, chief knowledge officer at Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC.
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday affirmed a lower court decision to dismiss a Mexican corporation’s multibillion dollar lawsuit against a Mexican government-owned salt mining company over an allegedly breached deal for a lucrative salt production byproduct, saying the U.S. court lacked jurisdiction.
As a clerk for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, my job was to mirror my boss’ views and values in everything I did. Years later, I find that I am still striving to live up to the values Justice Ginsburg instilled in me, as both a lawyer and a spouse, says Burden Walker, an assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Maryland.
Almost two decades after the Columbine shooting, we still suffer from attacks committed by obviously troubled individuals already on school officials’ or law enforcement’s radar. Recent rulings by California courts have held that schools have an affirmative duty to take reasonable steps to protect students, say Brian Kabateck and Joana Fang of Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court's Bristol-Myers Squibb decision, some courts have acknowledged that class certification is a form of joinder like traditional joinder, even while arguing that they do not need independent jurisdiction over class members’ claims. The irrational results speak for themselves, says Brian Troyer of Thompson Hine LLP.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is everything she is cracked up to be — feminist icon, brilliant jurist, fierce dissenter. She is also an incredible boss, mentor and friend. Her advice has shaped how I have tried to balance building a career and raising children, says Rachel Wainer Apter, counsel to the New Jersey attorney general.
The California Supreme Court's recent ruling in Troester v. Starbucks means that all work time may be considered compensable. Elizabeth Arnold and Chester Hanvey of Berkeley Research Group LLC describe how to conduct a time and motion observation study in the context of this decision.
Sidewalks are an increasingly integral part of how people and goods are transported. While some jurisdictions are banning certain technologies from their sidewalks, others are recognizing the importance of expanding mobility options, says Michele Satterlund, an attorney with McGuireWoods LLP and lobbyist with McGuireWoods Consulting.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court's Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California decision, some courts have chosen to treat a nonresident’s claim as within a court’s jurisdiction if the claimant is an absent class member, but not if the claimant is a named plaintiff. This has led to anomalous, irreconcilable outcomes, says Brian Troyer of Thompson Hine LLP.
One of us was a clerk when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg read her Ledbetter dissent from the bench, inviting Congress to act, and the other clerked a few years later, when RBG's prominently displayed copy of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act served as a daily reminder that dissents are not just for show, say Arun Subramanian and Mark Musico of Susman Godfrey LLP.
Given the frequency with which inter partes reviews are utilized in tandem with district court litigation to resolve patent disputes, the question that practitioners are starting to face with some regularity is whether, and to what extent, IPR decisions are admissible in district court litigation, say attorneys with WilmerHale.
Twenty years ago, the first state "ban the box" law crystallized a movement that, in time, would yield similar background check restrictions across the U.S. The result is a crisscrossing jumble of requirements, putting employers in a difficult position when dealing with applicants in different jurisdictions, say attorneys with Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC.