Why Sexual Harassment Victims Face Class Action Hurdles

By Daniel Messeloff and Emily Knight (March 7, 2018, 11:26 AM EST) -- In 2011, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes that 1.5 million women could not bring a class claim for gender discrimination against their employer, Wal-Mart, because factual issues relating to the wide range of underlying allegations could not be resolved "in one stroke."[1] Now, as the #MeToo movement gains increasing momentum, and as more victims of harassment and discrimination come forward and bring claims against their respective employers, courts are faced with how to handle class claims in light of Dukes....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!