A finance executive had little choice but to settle his dispute with an old employer and accept less money in a mediation after his lawyer let the clock run out on multiple claims stemming from his termination, a New York federal judge said Monday.
A California federal judge on Tuesday held off on preliminarily approving a $3.15 million settlement that would end two putative class actions alleging a FedEx logistics subsidiary didn’t give workers breaks and violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, saying during a hearing the deal is “very confusing” and needs to be revised.
A Pennsylvania federal jury has deadlocked over allegations the Allegheny County Office of the Public Defender passes over older attorneys for promotions and assigns them undesirable work, resulting in a mistrial.
The Third Circuit ruled on Tuesday that a nurse who alleged she was fired after objecting to illegal activity at Southwest Regional Medical Center in Pennsylvania was not protected by the whistleblower provisions in the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act because she had not first made a report of the activity.
The Fifth Circuit on Monday sided with an employee who is suing engineering and construction services firm Ref-Chem LP, holding that the company's failure to sign an arbitration agreement the employee had signed meant she had standing to bring her sexual harassment lawsuit in court.
Enforcement activities performed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration have decreased since the start of the Trump administration and experienced an even bigger decline at the start of the 2018 fiscal year, a report released Tuesday by the National Employment Law Project said.
A suit lodged by Walmart Inc. against its chief tax officer for entertaining a job offer with Amazon.com Inc. will proceed on an expedited basis after a Delaware state court judge on Tuesday agreed that the job offer represents a threat of harm to the company, but urged the parties to explore a mutual resolution over the next week.
LeClairRyan has announced it has landed a duo of labor and employment attorneys from Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC, saying the two have come on as partners in the firm’s Los Angeles office.
An Illinois federal judge gave final approval Tuesday to a $333,000 settlement between a cell tower servicer and a class of employees who accused the company of failing to pay them overtime for the time they spent driving between jobs, calling it a "very good settlement" to "a hard fought case."
Akerman LLP strengthened its employment practice with a former Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC attorney with experience defending employers against class action claims and federal agencies, making her the sixth management-side employment attorney to join the firm’s Los Angeles office this year, the firm announced Monday.
The U.S. government contested a federal court's refusal to force an orthopedic clinic in Florida to comply with its future payroll tax obligations, telling the Eleventh Circuit on Monday that the decision was akin to granting the clinic an unlimited line of credit.
A government watchdog that last year sued the U.S. Department of Labor seeking records related to its overtime and fiduciary rules told a Washington, D.C., federal judge Monday that it’s “concerned” the agency hasn’t been as forthcoming about its record searches as it should be.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission won an Illinois federal judge's approval Monday of a $4.4 million settlement with Amsted Rail Co. Inc. to end a disability bias suit alleging the steel castings manufacturer illegally rejected job applicants based on a medical test for carpal tunnel syndrome.
A California state appeals court on Monday declined to revive a purported whistleblower suit alleging LabCorp had pressured a genetic counselor to alter a patient’s medical records and then fired her, saying there was nothing medical about the records or illegal about the changes the counselor was asked to make.
Although critics have accused the National Labor Relations Board of becoming overly politicized in recent years — and the board's stance on issues like the legality of class waivers has left businesses and worker advocates sharply divided — former NLRB Chair Philip Miscimarra told Law360 in an exclusive interview that the labor board isn't operating any differently than it has in the past.
A federal magistrate judge in Texas has recommended that a lawsuit brought by the Communication Workers of America AFL-CIO against AT&T seeking to halt the layoffs of 713 workers be tossed, citing an arbitration provision in an agreement between the groups.
An Ohio megachurch cafe that in April convinced the Sixth Circuit to wipe out the U.S. Department of Labor's win on allegations that it "spiritually coerced" congregants into volunteering must make its case for the agency to pay its attorneys' fees to the district court judge who ruled against it, the appeals court said on Tuesday.
NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who started a wave of player national anthem protests, is expected to try to compel U.S. President Donald Trump to testify in an ongoing labor grievance, a move some experts said strategically looks to turn the president's politicization of the issue to Kaepernick's advantage.
A former audit partner at KPMG LLP has asked a Brooklyn federal judge to make prosecutors look for exculpatory evidence in files belonging to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and an accounting oversight group, saying both were essentially part of the prosecution team.
FedEx on Sunday asked the Sixth Circuit to undo a jury verdict that awarded a former employee $415,600 in her suit alleging retaliation and gender discrimination at a Michigan shop, arguing the former worker had impossibly alleged she was retaliated against before she had even made her complaint.
Since enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, nonprofit organizations may now be subject to federal excise tax on compensation and severance payments to their five most highly compensated executives. Starting with 2017, organizations that could be impacted should take steps to determine their exposure and maintain the records they will need in the event of an audit, says Sarah Ivy of FisherBroyles LLP.
In Oliveira v. New Prime, the U.S. Supreme Court faces the question of whether a trucking company can enforce an arbitration clause in its independent contractor agreement with its driver. The repercussions of a decision limiting the binding effects of arbitration clauses would be felt throughout the trucking industry, says Robert Campobasso of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP.
The California Supreme Court's recent ruling in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County has brought California in line with other states that rely on a so-called ABC test to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor. Elizabeth Arnold of Berkeley Research Group LLC offers strategies to systematically evaluate factor A of the test and the concept of control.
When was the last time your business reviewed its employee confidentiality agreements? Updating the agreement will greatly reduce your risk of being embroiled in a lengthy, expensive court battle with an employee who departs with your company’s confidential information, says Dylan Wiseman of Buchalter PC.
The Republican tax bill passed into law last year further enriches the wealthy and large corporations, provides minimal tax relief for the middle class, explodes the national debt, displaces needed investments in infrastructure and education and, on top of all that, spitefully targets specific groups and regions, including citizens in my own state, says Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J.
There are two components to the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Epic Systems v. Lewis worthy of further thought and analysis. The first is whether anything remains in the battle between individual arbitration clauses and class or collective actions, and the second is Justice Neil Gorsuch’s treatment of the National Labor Relations Board’s Chevron deference argument, say attorneys with Perkins Coie LLP.
The growth of litigation funding has only increased the controversy surrounding it. Looking to move beyond the rhetoric for and against the practice, attorney and investment analytics expert J.B. Heaton, of J.B. Heaton PC and Conjecture LLC, attempts an objective analysis of the underlying economics of the litigation funding arrangement.
Courts are acknowledging a shifting consumer preference toward electronic mediums. Proposed changes to Rule 23, scheduled to take effect at the end of this year, will officially provide for the use of electronic notice in class actions — a change that could save parties a significant amount of money, say Brandon Schwartz and Maggie Ivey of Garden City Group LLC.
Today's female lawyers stand on the shoulders of several generations of pioneers. Here, historian Jill Norgren explains how the status of women in the legal profession has changed since the 1870s.
Now that the California Supreme Court's lengthy opinion in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County has been digested, there are two main employee classification questions for California health care companies, say Gregg Fisch and Aytan Dahukey of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.