Tension Over 'Place Of Business' Timing For Patent Venue

By Brian Kwok and Winnie Wong (February 16, 2018, 12:31 PM EST) -- Patent litigants have been disputing the meaning of a "regular and established place of business" in the context of patent infringement venue with increasing frequency following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in TC Heartland.[1] An increasingly common dispute revolves around when a defendant must have its regular and established place of business in the judicial district for venue to be proper. Must it exist at the time of filing the complaint, or only when the alleged act of infringement occurred? Various district court decisions appear to answer this question differently....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!