Almost two-thirds of Europe's patent infringement cases are lodged in Germany, where the losing side has to pay and injunctions are granted as of right, the first stop on Law360's look at prominent patent jurisdictions around the globe.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has nixed multiple claims in a patent related to real-time traffic forecasting technology, siding with Google that the patent claims are invalid as obvious.
A 25-year-old Serbian man allegedly hacked into Electronic Arts Inc.'s computer network and stole the video game company’s licenses and in-game currency for its popular soccer game FIFA 2018, according to court documents filed in California federal court.
In this week’s round of intellectual property attorney moves, Montgomery McCracken snagged a powerful IP team from Buchanan Ingersoll, while Jones Day hired a first chair litigator in Silicon Valley, and litigation funder Therium brought a Hogan Lovells partner on board its investment team. Here are the details on these notable hires.
An Illinois federal judge has dismissed a suit accusing hardware store chain True Value Co. of infringing a patent for a credit card reader, saying the "paradox" and "circular reasoning" in the claim destroys the plaintiff's arguments for patent infringement.
Lowenstein Sandler LLP’s James Shehan, chair of the firm’s U.S. Food and Drug Administration practice, tells Law360 he's tracking patent litigation over biosimilars, watching for new off-label promotion policies and eyeing innovative approaches to clinical trials. This is the first installment in a series of interviews with FDA practice leaders.
Merus NV has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to keep in place a lower court's decision that rendered Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s genetically modified mouse patent unenforceable due to inequitable conduct during infringement litigation, saying its rival is attempting to "rewrite history."
McGuireWoods has brought husband and wife Yasser and Meghaan Madriz in as partners at the firm's Houston office, bolstering its litigation and labor and employment stable.
Smartphone chipmaker Qualcomm Inc. on Friday announced a $93 million settlement with Taiwan's antitrust watchdog to resolve claims the company refused to sell local manufacturers chips unless they agreed to the terms of its patent licensing, even as its licensing fight with Apple and regulators around the globe continues unabated.
The Federal Circuit on Thursday affirmed a lower court decision ordering MGA Entertainment to pay $4.2 million in damages and $2 million in attorneys' fees for copying another company’s patented game, despite the toymaker’s argument the district court abused its discretion by awarding enhanced damages.
VidAngel Inc. urged the Ninth Circuit to revive the company's antitrust counterclaims in the copyright infringement suit brought by Disney, Lucasfilm and other movie studios, saying during oral arguments Thursday that the refusal of all the major studios to play ball with the family-friendly streaming service supports an inference of a conspiracy among them.
Electric vehicle startup EVelozcity sued Faraday & Future on Thursday in California state court, calling a contract term its competitor imposes to prevent departing employees from encouraging colleagues to also leave for another company “illegally restrictive.”
The Eleventh Circuit on Thursday ruled that Aspen Specialty Insurance Co. does not have to cover a Florida condominium group’s costs to defend a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by the owner of an Alaska hotel, agreeing with a lower court that a policy exclusion for intellectual property claims bars coverage.
Law360's tour of prominent patent jurisdictions around the globe focuses this week on China, where patent applications and infringement actions in specialized courts are booming, but a lack of discovery and political concerns might give pause to some foreign litigants.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday proposed increasing the fee to challenge patents in America Invents Act reviews by about 25 percent beginning in 2021, citing additional work for the office created by the U.S. Supreme Court's recent SAS Institute decision.
An audio device maker has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to consider whether patent claims canceled in America Invents Act reviews are regulatory takings by the government, such that patent owners are owed compensation on constitutional grounds, particularly those whose patents were filed or issued before 2011.
A California federal judge has awarded StubHub a win over allegations it flouted the Defend Trade Secrets Act when it hired three employees from a startup company who allegedly used proprietary data from their former company in apps they developed for the online ticket vendor.
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. has abandoned its trademark on the “Defender” name because it hasn’t sold one in the United States since 1998, Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. argued in legal papers filed in Michigan federal court defending its counterclaims to the former’s patent infringement suit.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has ruled that consumers would confuse a craft brewer’s “Mastermind” beer brand with an already-registered “Mastermind Vodka” trademark.
A California federal judge issued a findings of fact order that favored Ugg maker Deckers Outdoor Corp. following a $5.2 million verdict that held Romeo and Juliette Inc. liable for infringing two design patents.
A Louisiana federal judge on Thursday kept alive the majority of the City of New Orleans’ claims against the operator of the city's historic St. Roch Market food hall in a fight over the rights to the market’s trademark, with a trademark dilution claim the only one to get the ax.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
After a three-year surge, patent suits at the Federal Circuit leveled off last year as the court showed signs of adjusting to its bustling workload. The judges found time to write more opinions, and they reached greater consensus, penning fewer separate concurrences and dissents than in 2016.
Notwithstanding well-settled precedent, the Federal Circuit in Praxair v. Mallinckrodt expressly equated printed matter limitations lacking patentable weight with patent-ineligible subject matter, says Paul Zagar of Leason Ellis LLP.
As new communications platforms displace email, the legal industry is awkwardly grappling with complex e-discovery questions. Fortunately, this environment provides a very fertile ground of incentives for innovation in both e-discovery technology and service offerings, says Thomas Bonk of Epiq.
What are U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh's views on intellectual property? He has not been presented with a lot of IP-specific issues, but a few D.C. Circuit cases give some clues as to his thinking, says Van Lindberg of Dykema Gossett PLLC.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's proposed rule changing claim construction in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is likely to be adopted in some form. In view of the 300 comments submitted over the last two months, we have a few predictions and some questions, say attorneys with Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
Notwithstanding the latest salary war among prominent law firms, I urge my middle-aged and older colleagues to help the recent graduates we know focus on the long term. Even if the salary is the same, there is a big difference between an institutional firm and the relatively younger firms matching BigLaw, says J.B. Heaton, a University of Chicago business law fellow and former partner at Bartlit Beck.
The analysis underlying the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in WesternGeco v. Ion opens the door to arguments for reasonable royalty damages based on foreign activities arising from domestic infringement, say attorneys with Robins Kaplan LLP.
Law professor Nathalie Martin's new book, "Lawyering From the Inside Out: Learning Professional Development Through Mindfulness and Emotional Intelligence," can be of value to any lawyer aiming to achieve greater productivity, relieve the stress of the legal profession and focus on goals, says U.S. District Chief Judge Denise Page Hood of the Eastern District of Michigan.
We studied more than 50 inter partes review institution decisions issued since the U.S. Supreme Court's SAS Institute ruling ended partial reviews at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The results to date are encouraging, say Stephen Schreiner of Goodwin Procter LLP and Maxine Graham of American Express Co.
The blockbuster e-discovery cases, with big sanctions and bigger controversies, have been few and far between this year. But that doesn’t mean the legal questions around e-discovery have been answered. Let’s take a closer look at three cases worthy of our attention, says Casey Sullivan, an attorney at discovery technology provider Logikcull.
A Florida federal court's decision last month involving a dentist’s before-and-after patient photos enhances the body of law where courts have determined that an author’s work was not sufficiently creative to establish a valid copyright, says Matthew Nelles of Berger Singerman LLP.