The challenges of U.S. patent litigation, combined with increasing levels of comfort with courts in Europe and Asia, are driving companies in high-stakes disputes to increasingly look beyond the U.S. and adopt global enforcement strategies.
IBM Corp. told a federal jury in Delaware on Monday that Groupon Inc. should pay about $166.5 million in damages for infringing four of what it described as widely licensed IBM patents that helped make early public use of the internet faster and more efficient.
A former Apple employee accused of illegally downloading the tech giant's proprietary information related to self-driving cars before taking a job with a Chinese self-driving car company pled not guilty in California federal court Monday to trade secret theft.
Texas A&M University has convinced the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to block Washington Soap Co. from registering the phrase “12th Man Hands” for its soap, with the board saying there was a likelihood of confusion because the university frequently gives away rally towels bearing the "12th Man" slogan at football games.
The parent company of fantasy sports operator Scout Fantasy is suing CBS Interactive Inc., accusing it of trying to steal its brand and deceive its customers by continuing to use trademarks CBSi had previously licensed, even after Scout killed the deal over CBSi’s repeated failures to pay on time.
The Federal Circuit said Monday that it won’t rehear a panel’s decision upholding the cancellation of several of Schlumberger Ltd. unit WesternGeco LLC’s oil exploration patents, jeopardizing the company’s ability to collect more than $100 million over the infringement of those patents by one of its rivals.
AbbVie Inc. has accused the Federal Trade Commission of suddenly hiking the interest rate it and an affiliate must pay on a $448 million penalty over sham patent suits that delayed generic drug rollouts and extended their monopoly on AndroGel.
Blackbird Technologies, a Boston patent litigation company founded by former BigLaw partners, notched a victory at the Federal Circuit on Monday, when the court revived infringement lawsuits it brought against companies over a patent related to energy-efficient lighting.
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. has asked the Federal Circuit not to reconsider West-Ward Pharmaceuticals’ challenge to a patent covering the schizophrenia drug Fanapt, saying the court rightly found that the medication was patent-eligible under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Mayo test.
A Florida federal judge on Monday said she would only allow Hard Rock Cafe Inc. to drop a failed trademark lawsuit against a startup called RockStar Hotels Inc. if the hospitality giant repaid a portion of the smaller company’s legal bills.
DLA Piper has added a partner from McDermott Will & Emery LLP to its intellectual property and technology practice in Los Angeles, the firm announced Friday.
Data patent holder Blue Spike LLC has accused smart TV company Roku Inc. of importing streaming products that violate the Texas company’s intellectual property rights, asking the U.S. International Trade Commission to ban future infringing imports.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has fired back at a bid for U.S. Supreme Court review by the owner of a web linking patent found invalid after it was challenged by Google, saying there is "no basis" for the owner’s arguments that the Federal Circuit had flouted precedent.
An executive order signed last week by President Donald Trump eliminating the competitive examination and selection procedures for appointing administrative law judges has heightened concerns that both the ALJ hiring process and decisions made by the judges will be unduly influenced by politics, legal experts said Monday.
Italian fashion house Gucci won a ruling at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board blocking the great-grandson of its namesake founder from registering trademarks for his “Uberto Gucci” brand.
Puma asked a Boston federal court on Friday to dismiss Nike's claims that the alleged infringement of patents for trendy knitted shoes was willful, and to dismiss claims for two of the patents-in-suit altogether.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is still mulling over whether to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate the Lanham Act's ban on "scandalous" trademarks, pushing the decision back to August.
Determining that drugmaker Indivior will likely be able to show its suit claiming infringement by Dr. Reddy’s of a so-called child patent covering its Suboxone Film will not be precluded by a suit in which Dr. Reddy’s was cleared of infringement of the parent patent, a New Jersey federal judge on Friday granted Indivior a preliminary injunction blocking sales.
Just weeks before trial in Arista Networks Inc.’s antitrust suit against Cisco Systems Inc., the parties squared off Friday in California federal court over Arista's bid to introduce expert testimony that it lost about $160 million after Cisco asserted copyright violations to block sales of competing ethernet switches.
The Federal Circuit on Friday affirmed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upholding the validity of a patent covering the design of building insulation.
The photographer who claims Nike Inc. ripped off his Michael Jordan photo to create its signature “Jumpman” logo got a break from the Ninth Circuit on Friday, after the court agreed to hold off on finalizing a recent ruling against him while he takes his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
After a three-year surge, patent suits at the Federal Circuit leveled off last year as the court showed signs of adjusting to its bustling workload. The judges found time to write more opinions, and they reached greater consensus, penning fewer separate concurrences and dissents than in 2016.
Earlier this year, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., made headlines with his decision to leave Congress and return to law. In this series, former members of Congress who made that move discuss how their experience on the Hill influenced their law practice.
The District of Massachusetts recently issued an updated rule for scheduling and procedures in patent infringement cases, to make the district a more convenient venue. Perhaps the most important change is the newly accelerated litigation timeline, says Aaron Jacobs of Prince Lobel Tye LLP.
While resolving the issue of the availability of foreign lost profits in the context of Section 271(f)(2), the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in WesternGeco v. Ion leaves many issues unresolved, say Mark Kachner and Karen Vogel Weil of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.
The Senate Republican leadership and the Trump administration are racing to fill Justice Anthony Kennedy’s spot on the U.S. Supreme Court. Does opposition to their plans have any chance of success? My answer is yes, because the stakes are so high, people are so engaged, and the records of those short-listed are so deeply troubling, says Nan Aron, president of Alliance for Justice.
As clients increasingly look to limit their own liability exposure, they can reasonably expect that their retained counsel should do the same. In this context, a carefully crafted, thoughtfully presented engagement letter can help a law firm strike a successful balance between protecting itself and preserving a client relationship, say Stuart Pattison and John Muller of Sompo International Holdings Ltd.
In this analysis of disciplinary action trends in the legal industry, Edwards Neils LLC managing member Jean Edwards examines data provided by bar organizations for 17 states and the District of Columbia.
The Federal Circuit's recent interpretation of “manufactured” in FastShip v. U.S. will likely prove consequential for companies seeking to enforce their patent rights against federal contractors and the U.S. government under Section 1498, say attorneys with Arnold & Porter.
Although courts and companies have at times struggled to keep pace with the rapidly evolving challenges surrounding the use of cloud-based software, some best practices have emerged from the body of case law addressing claims of cloud-based appropriation of trade secrets, say attorneys with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
With law firms increasingly exposed to professional liability risks associated with their corporate client relationships, firms must craft well-structured client engagement letters to help protect against malpractice claims. Two key elements of an engagement letter are how it defines the scope of engagement and how it handles conflicts of interest, say Stuart Pattison and John Muller of Sompo International Holdings Ltd.
Today, members of Congress often seem able to blame colleagues of the other party for not getting anything done for their constituents. In law practice, you can’t really blame a bad result for your clients on the lawyers on the other side, says former Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP.