Advances in artificial intelligence raise intriguing patent law questions, including whether AI breakthroughs are patent-eligible and whether AI that creates something can be an "inventor" entitled to a patent. Here's a look at issues attorneys say patent law will soon need to confront in this burgeoning field.
Qatar has requested World Trade Organization dispute consultations with Saudi Arabia over intellectual property rights owned by the country's nationals, saying Saudi Arabia's imposition of punitive political measures against Qatar has resulted in widespread broadcasting piracy of sports and entertainment network beIN Media Group LLC.
A Second Circuit panel on Thursday nixed a music publisher’s attempt to revive a copyright infringement suit alleging that a Spanish-language broadcaster played its songs without permission, upholding a lower court’s finding that the publisher had failed to support its claims that the songs were ever played on the radio.
A New Jersey federal judge has refused to dismiss pharmaceutical information technology company Veeva Systems Inc.’s monopoly claims in its countersuit against life sciences data giant IQVIA Inc., ruling Wednesday that it plausibly alleged IQVIA tried to block customer access to its product.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board gutted a Wi-Fi hotspot patent that T-Mobile US Inc. had been accused of infringing, finding Wednesday that numerous claims in the patent were invalid.
Synopsys Inc. urged a California federal judge Wednesday to sanction Ubiquiti Networks Inc. for allegedly destroying tens of thousands of files relevant to Synopsys' lawsuit that accuses the networking company of using its design software without paying and violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
A New York federal judge on Thursday tossed out a case accusing Getty Images Inc. of "recklessly" selling access to tens of thousands of photos it didn’t own, saying the press agency behind the lawsuit had “nobody to blame but itself.”
A First Circuit panel on Thursday said it wouldn’t reconsider its decision to uphold the dismissal of an antitrust suit accusing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. of delaying a generic version of its leukemia drug Gleevec.
Siding with snack giant Frito-Lay Inc., the Federal Circuit issued a ruling Thursday that the brand names "Corn Thins" and "Rice Thins" are too descriptive to be registered as federal trademarks.
Cellular standard-essential patent practices have "never" required SEP holders to license that technology at the component level rather than the final product, Nokia said Wednesday in seeking to back Qualcomm against a Federal Trade Commission effort to require just that amid an antitrust suit in California federal court.
Microsoft Corp. has joined LOT Network, a patent-licensing initiative aimed at curbing lawsuits by so-called patent trolls, the group announced Thursday, a high-profile addition for a network that has grown rapidly since launching four years ago.
Athena Diagnostics and Oxford University Innovation Ltd. on Thursday asked a Federal Circuit panel to revive their patent for a test that diagnoses an autoimmune disease based on the presence of certain antibodies, saying a lower court erred in finding the patent covered an ineligible law of nature.
Bankrupt gadget retailer Brookstone Holdings Corp. received court approval Thursday for a $65 million sale of its remaining retail business consisting of more than 30 airport locations and its website.
A Second Circuit judge hearing appeals of a lower court's decision to throw out a copyright lawsuit against Jay-Z by a man who says he made the logo for the rapper's label Roc-A-Fella Records rebuked the plaintiff's lawyer on Thursday, saying the case "has a real stench to it" and that his advocacy "falls far short" of standards.
Vice President Mike Pence on Thursday forcefully rebuked China for attempting to interfere in the looming midterm elections with retaliatory tariffs and propaganda campaigns, following President Donald Trump's lead and veering the two countries' trade battle squarely into political territory.
The energy-market data firm Genscape Inc. has filed suit against a former employee who is now the CEO of a competitor in Colorado federal court over allegations that he stole company secrets that allowed his new employer to bypass years of expensive research.
Six former Morgan Stanley Smith Barney brokers asked an Illinois federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit from their former employer alleging that they tried to lure former clients to a new firm after jumping ship, saying the suit is based on nothing more than speculation and unenforceable employee agreements and policies.
E-cigarette company Juul on Wednesday hit several competitors with a complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission, accusing them of selling and importing copycats that infringe on its patents and use inappropriate flavors targeted toward children.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP has snagged a former Irell & Manella LLP partner and veteran entertainment attorney, who brings with him more than three decades of experience representing blockbuster media companies from Paramount Pictures to Hulu, the firm said Wednesday.
A photographer widely known for his photos depicting the black experience in America sued rapper Cam’ron in New York federal court, claiming the Harlem rap artist who has waged his own copyright suits against Kanye West, Universal Music and others is now stealing his iconic photo of 1980s Harlem.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration appears poised to shame branded-drug makers that make strategically timed objections to generic-drug approval standards, providing new ammunition for antitrust suits over delayed access to lower-cost medicines.
The challenges of U.S. patent litigation, combined with increasing levels of comfort with courts in Europe and Asia, are driving companies in high-stakes disputes to increasingly look beyond the U.S. and adopt global enforcement strategies. But it can be daunting to sift through the intricacies of patent litigation around the world. Here, we break down what you need to know about some of the world’s hottest patent venues.
One year ago the U.S. Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling on where patent lawsuits can be filed. It was expected to shake up patent litigation in a big way. But did that happen? Here, Law360 takes a look at the impact the case had on the patent landscape.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued two big patent rulings — upholding a system for challenging patents as constitutional, but finding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must decide the validity of every challenged claim when it agrees to institute those American Invents Act reviews. Here, Law360 looks at how we got here, what the court ruled, and how these decisions will impact practicing before the PTAB.
In this monthly series, Amanda Brady of Major Lindsey & Africa interviews management from top law firms about the increasingly competitive business environment. Here we feature Melanie Green, chief client development officer at Faegre Baker Daniels LLP.
The Federal Circuit's decision last month in Maatita effectively eliminates the design patent requirement that drawings must enable a person of skill in the art to make and use the invention. The court failed to properly apply statutory standards, leading to an improper result, say Robert Anders of A Design Consultancy and Christopher Rourk of Jackson Walker LLP.
Last year’s business-friendly amendment of Internal Revenue Code Section 168(k), which allows immediate expensing for certain business assets, left many questions. In August, the Department of Treasury proposed rules clarifying requirements for depreciable property, but not all solutions are permanent and many issues remain unresolved, say attorneys at Eversheds Sutherland LLP.
Earlier this year, President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese products as a response to China’s trade practices concerning technology transfer, intellectual property and innovation. The U.S.-Chinese trade war highlights the need to approach investments in China differently, taking a broad view of intellectual assets and looking beyond basic legal protection, says Holly White, a consultant at Rouse & Co.
A California federal court's refusal last week to reconsider Davis v. Electronic Arts magnifies the manifest errors in its recent decision by ignoring the blatantly obvious identifiability of the former NFL players, says Ronald Katz of GCA Law Partners LLP.
Decisions granting extensions of 30-month stays under the Hatch-Waxman Act are infrequent and often not reported. This small body of cases provides helpful benchmarks for parties, say Jeffrey Lewis and Niki Ikahihifo-Bender of Norton Rose Fulbright.
A Delaware federal court's ruling in Amgen v. Hospira last month may indicate a significant narrowing of the patent infringement exception for activities related to obtaining drug approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, say attorneys at Paul Hastings LLP.
The Federal Circuit’s decision in Applications in Internet Time v. RPX expansively interprets the term “real party in interest” and creates new hurdles for companies that ask the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to institute an inter partes or post-grant review, says Craig Countryman of Fish & Richardson PC.
Companies are heavily investing in artificial neural networks and implementing them into products and businesses. This technology provides a vivid illustration of some of the challenges in seeking intellectual property protection for artificial intelligence, say attorneys with Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP.
Many practitioners may be surprised to learn that a transition application filed as a continuation application can trigger the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the America Invents Act and can be challenged under post-grant review. This was the situation in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board case of Schul v. EMSEAL, say Joe Hetz and Chris Gerardot of Brinks Gilson & Lione.