An Iowa appeals court on Wednesday affirmed a jury’s decision to clear a doctor in a suit alleging he caused a baby’s severe brain damage by failing to perform a cesarean section, saying certain evidence was properly excluded by the trial judge.
A Massachusetts state jury awarded $4 million in a suit accusing doctors of failing to provide a 36-year-old woman with proper medical care, which caused her death shortly after she gave birth to a healthy child, the family’s attorney said.
A South Carolina jury has awarded $10 million to the estate of a woman who allegedly died after doctors detected kidney cancer on her scans but failed to treat the cancer or tell her that she had cancer for years.
Two Texas Supreme Court justices said during oral argument Wednesday they are bothered that a “technicality” in the form of an allegedly defective expert report could wipe out a medical malpractice claim with “obvious merit” brought by a patient who was blinded during cataract surgery.
A Missouri state appellate court reversed a jury verdict in favor of a doctor who claimed she had been fired for reporting a fellow doctor’s alleged misconduct, ruling that the conduct the doctor reported was itself protected by state law and that the doctor thus could not be considered a whistleblower.
A New York appeals panel on Tuesday revived claims lodged against a doctor accused of perforating a woman’s bile duct, which purportedly caused liver failure, saying the patient’s estate and a co-defendant doctor who performed an initial procedure credibly claimed that the doctor was at fault.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case that ended in a $10.1 million jury verdict in favor of a woman who sued a Philadelphia hospital over her infant's delayed bacterial meningitis diagnosis, putting an end to a nearly two-year appeals process.
An Arizona jury has cleared a urologist of liability in a suit accusing him of failing to warn a man about the risks of kidney removal surgery, which purportedly contributed to the patient’s death, finding in favor of the doctor on the lone claim of wrongful death.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a case in which the North Carolina state Supreme Court ruled that a doctor could not enforce an arbitration agreement because he had breached his fiduciary duty by not properly informing the patient what he was signing.
A New York state appellate court declined Friday to revive a suit over prenatal care brought by a couple who lost their son an hour after birth, ruling that the law does not provide an avenue for the parents of a baby who was born alive to sue unless the mother suffered an independent injury as a result of the alleged medical malpractice.
A Pennsylvania appellate panel on Friday affirmed a jury’s decision to clear a hospital of negligently administering to an emergency room patient a drug that purportedly caused tissue and nerve damage, saying a juror’s alleged financial ties to the hospital didn’t warrant overturning the verdict.
A Tennessee appellate panel on Thursday upheld the dismissal of a suit accusing a hospital of negligent treatment that contributed to a patient’s death, finding the patient’s family failed to show he had been “adjudicated incompetent” at the time of death and thus the suit is time-barred.
A Texas appeals court has refused to toss a malpractice suit accusing two doctors of failing to test for or properly treat a woman suffering a heart attack, concluding the lower court rightly rejected objections to the woman’s medical experts.
The United States government shouldn’t have to face a medical malpractice lawsuit brought against a federally funded tribal wellness center over alleged botched root canal treatments, a California federal judge said Thursday, recommending the suit be tossed due to a lack of expert testimony.
A Texas state appellate court on Thursday threw out a neurosurgeon’s suit claiming that the hospital where he worked suspended him and reported him to the Texas Medical Board after he complained about a fellow doctor, ruling that the hospital’s interactions with the board fell under protected speech.
A patient suing a skilled nursing facility for ordinary negligence urged Maryland’s highest court on Thursday to revive her suit, arguing that her claim that a nurse dropped her while using a mechanical lift is not medical treatment and shouldn’t invoke state requirements for medical malpractice cases.
A mother who successfully sued a Nebraska hospital over her infant’s severe brain injury has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the constitutionality of the state’s cap on medical malpractice damages, arguing that her right to a jury trial was violated.
The Florida Supreme Court opted on Thursday to suspend an attorney for one year, going beyond the recommended 60-day suspension, for soliciting the mother of a brain-injured child to be his client despite the fact that she had not sought legal representation.
An Iowa-based insurance company is seeking to limit coverage for a chiropractic office embroiled in a lawsuit over allegedly mishandled injections, contending that its insured can’t recoup that maximum value of the policy based on that claim alone, according to a complaint Wednesday in New Mexico federal court.
A New York state appellate court has tossed out claims against a New York City pain clinic and two anesthesiologists accused of causing a patient’s chronic pain condition during surgery, ruling that the patient’s experts had been unable to tie the clinic or the anesthesiologist to her symptoms.