This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Naval engineers oppose US Supreme Court review of no-poach case

( November 21, 2025, 22:13 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Naval engineers bringing US antitrust claims against General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls and other shipbuilders over no-poach agreements opposed review by the US Supreme Court, arguing that the petition presents a question not in the case. They said the companies don’t challenge the lower court’s consensus affirmative-acts standard for fraudulent concealment. Instead, their real challenge is aimed at the way the court applied the context-dependent standard to the specific factual allegations in the case, but the Supreme Court rarely grants petitions where the “asserted error” is “the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law” to the facts of a case.  See attached file. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections