Fraudulent concealment not evidence of illegal agreement, US shipbuilders say
( September 2, 2025, 22:32 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: General Dynamics, other shipbuilders and specialized consulting and recruiting firms told a Virginia federal judge that a decision reviving engineers' no-poach claims from the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit did not resolve an open question about whether the case should be dismissed due to the lack of a well-pled anticompetitive agreement among the defendants. While the Fourth Circuit found that interviews with industry insiders strengthened the plausibility of the plaintiffs' allegations, the defendants said in a reply brief filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, "those allegations are neither direct evidence of an agreement nor circumstantial evidence of an agreement and plus factors."See attached document....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.