Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Winston & Strawn
-
Order | Filed: May 17, 2024 | Entered: May 17, 2024 United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Reven Holdings, Inc. et al
Securities, Commodities, Exchange | Colorado
Order
ORDER re: 124 Defendants' and Relief Defendants' Motion to Narrow Preliminary Injunction to Lift Asset Freeze.
At present, I am not persuaded by the defendants' arguments that it is appropriate to lift the asset freeze in its entirety. See Docs. 124 , 128 . I further note that contrary to the defendants' repeated assertions that they have "disproved" the alleged misappropriation, "even under the defendants' own calculations," "the Reven Principals took in $4.89 to $5.75 million more [in compensation] than they disclosed to investors" over a three-year period. Doc. 122 at 8-10 & n.7 (emphasis added).
Should the defendants wish to propose a more specific plan regarding the amount of funds or particular assets as to which the asset freeze should be lifted and a description of the planned transaction(s) in which such assets would be used, they must include any such proposal in response to 133 Intervenor Investor Group's Motion to Intervene and 135 Intervenor Investor Group's Motion to Appoint General Receiver.
The defendants' responses to those motions (and the plaintiff's response to the motion to appoint a receiver) are due by 5/31/2024, and the intervenors' replies are due by 6/14/2024. See Local Civ. R. 7.1(d). If the defendants propose a more specific plan regarding a partial lift of the asset freeze, the plaintiff may respond to that proposal on or before 6/14/2024.
If necessary to meet any impending deadlines for patent maintenance fees or the like, the defendants may file a motion for specific limited relief from the asset freeze while the motions to lift the freeze, intervene, and appoint a receiver remain pending. See, e.g., Docs. 73 , 74 .
SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/17/2024. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) -
Motion | Filed: May 20, 2024 | Entered: May 20, 2024 In Re: FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation
Other Fraud | Florida Southern
Miscellaneous Relief
Joint MOTION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS ON DEFENDANT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 671 MOTION TO DISMISS 534 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer,,, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Leandro Cabo, Alexander Chernyavsky, Chukwudozie Ezeokoli, Edwin Garrison, Ryan Henderson, Shengyun Huang, Sunil Kavuri, Michael Livieratos, Michael Norris, Brandon Orr, Julie Papadakis, Gregg Podalsky, Kyle Rupprecht, Shetty Vijeth, Vitor Vozza, Warren Winter. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moskowitz, Adam)
-
Order | Filed: May 20, 2024 | Entered: May 20, 2024 In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
P.I.: Other | Ohio Northern
Order
Order [non-document]: The Court will conduct a Zoom Status Conference on Wednesday, May 22, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. Required to attend are lead Plaintiff's counsel for all four PBM cases and general PEC representation; lead counsel and general counsel for Express Scripts and Optum Rx; and the Law Directors for the four bellwether cities or counties. Zoom invitations will be sent directly to counsel. Entered on behalf Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 5/20/2024. (R,AP)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login