Civil Litigation
-
November 05, 2025
New federal immigration levels plan cuts targets for permanent & new temporary resident admissions
Ottawa’s three-year plan to reduce immigration to “sustainable” levels includes new “one-time” initiatives to “recognize eligible Protected Persons in Canada as permanent residents over the next two years” and to “accelerate the transition of up to 33,000 work permit holders to permanent residency in 2026 and 2027.”
-
November 05, 2025
Saskatchewan introduces legislation to modernize defamation laws
Saskatchewan is proposing legislative changes in a bid to modernize the province’s defamation laws, which would include eliminating the “outdated” distinction between libel and slander.
-
November 05, 2025
Emotional distress: The ‘invisible injury’ in tort law
Not all injuries can be seen. Emotional distress — often called the “invisible injury” — shows up in many tort cases, especially negligence claims. But proving and valuing psychological harm has always been tricky. Over time, Canadian courts have worked to clarify what counts as compensable emotional distress and how to prove it.
-
November 05, 2025
Proposed settlement of $4M reached in data breach class action
A proposed settlement of over $4 million has been reached in a class action alleging that class members, who were customers of the password management site LastPass, were affected in a data security breach reported by the company in August 2022.
-
November 05, 2025
Arbitration appeals: Why ‘final’ might be the last word
The principle of finality in arbitration is not merely aspirational. The Ontario Superior Court’s decision in 2501373 Ontario Inc. v. Selfe, 2025 ONSC 5216 confirms that, in Ontario, using the phrase “final and binding” in an arbitration clause may foreclose appellate review, even on questions of law. Where appeals are available on legal questions but leave is required, the would-be appellant must identify an extricable question of law — and courts do not readily extract legal issues from arbitral findings.
-
November 05, 2025
CIVIL PROCEDURE - Third party procedure - Notice - Striking out or setting aside
Appeal by Grant Thornton LLP from chambers judge’s decision striking third party notice. Two of the limited partners in a real estate development, Interior Equities Corp. and KF Capital Ltd., sued the general partner, Cadence at the Lake Management Ltd., claiming that CLM took certain steps that caused prejudice to their position.
-
November 04, 2025
Federal budget proposes new laws, spending cuts and $1 trillion in ‘generational investments’
The Liberal government’s 2025 federal budget contains dozens of legislative and justice-related proposals, including new and expanded anti-money laundering provisions, a new Canada Labour Code restriction on the use of non-compete agreements, and the creation of an Environmental Protection Tribunal of Canada. Summed up, the stated theme of the federal budget introduced by Finance and National Revenue Minister François-Philippe Champagne in the House of Commons on Nov. 4, 2025, is “smarter public spending and stronger capital investment.”
-
November 04, 2025
Court denies injunction in trademark dispute between mental health program providers
The Federal Court has dismissed a motion for an interlocutory injunction in an alleged trademark infringement case concerning the term “guardians” used by mental health and addictions program providers.
-
November 04, 2025
What are appropriate parenting orders in contentious divorce involving mental health, family violence?
The matter of Deschamps v. Deschamps, 2025 ONSC 4737 involved a 10-year marriage with two children (ages 13 and nine at the time of the decision) who had grown estranged from their mother after a history of family violence committed by the father against the mother.
-
November 04, 2025
Looking at Bill C-223 through a family violence lens
Bill C-223, Liberal MP Lisa Hepner’s private member’s bill, proposes revisions to the Divorce Act. These revisions build on significant changes with respect to the role of family violence in child-related issues made just four years ago through Bill C-78.