Intellectual Property

  • October 03, 2024

    Federal Court grants interim order blocking protest websites targeting Indigo books chain

    The Federal Court has allowed a motion by Toronto-based Indigo Books & Music Inc. for an interim domain blocking order against defendants operating websites entitled Indigo Kills Kids. It was said to be the first time that such an order was granted to apply to cellular service along with internet service.

  • October 03, 2024

    SCC judges to visit 5 cities, pick law student contest winner in 2025 as top court marks 150 years

    The Supreme Court of Canada is giving ambitious law students a rare opportunity to impress its nine judges.

  • October 02, 2024

    B.C. privacy decision recognizes where someone lives is different than where they work from: lawyer

    B.C.’s top court has ruled that short-term rental addresses are personal information under provincial legislation, with a lawyer saying the decision recognizes the fact that where someone lives is fundamentally different from just a place that someone works from — even if a place has elements of both.

  • October 01, 2024

    COPYRIGHT - Infringement - Defences to infringement - Statutory defences

    Claim by plaintiff for copyright infringement arising from photographs taken by the late Vivian Maier ("Maier"). The plaintiff was the estate of Maier who was the owner of copyright in a variety of original works made by Maier, including those embodied in a collection of black and white negatives ("B&W Negatives") and colour slides and transparencies ("Colour Negatives").

  • October 01, 2024

    Sword in the stone: Demystifying the concept of ‘use’ in patent infringement dispute

    The recent ruling by the Federal Court of Appeal in Steelhead LNG (ASLNG) Ltd. v. Arc Resources Ltd., (2024 FCA 67), navigates through the complexities surrounding patent infringement claims. Much like the legendary challenge of drawing the sword from the stone, this case meticulously unpacks the scope and concept of “use” in the context of infringement under s. 42 of the Patent Act.

  • September 27, 2024

    Federal Court offers bar, litigants expedited ‘no-hearing’ judicial review for study permit refusals

    In an effort to speed up the judicial review of hundreds of study permit refusals as the Federal Court also contends with thousands of other immigration cases, the national trial court is offering parties who opt into a new pilot project a “simplified” no-hearing, in-writing-only procedure where judges will simultaneously decide a JR leave application and the JR’s merits, and do so within five months rather than the 14 to 18 months usually required for a final decision under the general procedure.

  • September 27, 2024

    Lax O’Sullivan welcomes new lawyer

    A recent news release from Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP announced the addition of Anne Posno.

  • September 24, 2024

    3 judicial appointments announced for Quebec

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Arif Virani announced the appointment of Mathieu Piché-Messier, Lysane Cree and Horia Bundaru as judges of the Superior Court of Quebec, a Sept. 23 news release announced.

  • September 24, 2024

    The impact of AI on patent infringement research: A new era of efficiency and accuracy

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries worldwide, and the field of intellectual property (IP) law is no exception. Patent infringement research, once a labour-intensive and time-consuming process, is being revolutionized by AI. This transformation is not just about automating routine tasks; it’s about enhancing the precision, efficiency and profitability of legal services.

  • September 24, 2024

    Safeguarding intellectual property: Key insights for employers

    In today’s dynamic business environment, companies are dedicating substantial resources to the creation of innovative products, technologies and processes to gain a competitive edge. However, the value of these innovations can be jeopardized if intellectual property ownership is not clearly established and protected within the employment context. It can be crucial for companies to ensure that they obtain and retain ownership of intellectual property developed by their employees and, in some cases, even intellectual property created by their contractors.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.