- SECTIONS
- Business
- Pulse
- Access to Justice
- Labour & Employment
- Wills, Trusts & Estates
- Family
- Criminal
- Civil Litigation
- Personal Injury
- In-House Counsel
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Immigration
- Natural Resources
- Real Estate
- Tax
- ABOUT Law360 CANADA
- About us
- Explore Law360 Canada
- Contact us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Subscribe
- My Account
Sections
In an adverse possession judgment that rejects a novel judge-made immunity exempting municipal parkland from matured possessory claims in Ontario, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled 5-4 that a Toronto couple owns a strip of municipal parkland that was fenced into their backyard decades ago by their home’s previous owner: Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28. MORE TO COME.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT