( August 1, 2025, 10:22 AM EDT) -- JACKSON, Miss. — A federal judge in Mississippi should explain how a ruling came to include nonexistent parties, facts and quotes and preserve both the original incorrect opinion and a subsequently issued replacement, defendants in a case challenging a state law banning the teaching of “divisive” topics say. The plaintiffs moved to file a second amended complaint in the wake of Trump v. CASA, which limits injunctions to named parties....