Mealey Publications™
TOP STORIES
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel largely affirmed the dismissal of a sprawling pro se complaint brought by the subject of a documentary titled “The Hatchet Wielding Hitchhiker,” agreeing with a California federal judge’s finding that the man’s copyright claims failed but also finding that he narrowly established a defamation claim against one defendant-appellee for potentially fabricated claims made in the documentary.
NEW ORLEANS — In a per curiam order denying panel rehearing issued without explanation, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals let stand its reversal of an award of more than $1.25 million in attorney fees to a former National Football League player who sued for a higher level of disability benefits than he was awarded, prevailed after a bench trial and then saw that favorable ruling reversed in a previous appeal.
NEW ORLEANS — A Louisiana appeals panel held that a commercial general liability insurance policy’s assault and battery exclusion unambiguously bars coverage for a wrongful death lawsuit arising from a fatal shooting that occurred at an apartment that was owned by the insured, affirming a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurer.
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles PC’s knowing collaboration on talc litigation with a former Johnson & Johnson attorney who worked on the same litigation warrants disqualifying the firm from New Jersey’s asbestos-talc multicounty litigation, a state appeals court held in a Feb. 6 opinion reversing a trial court.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a Minnesota federal judge’s decision to grant summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of a company accused by Little Giant Ladder Systems LLC; the panel agreed that the accused product did not meet the court’s construction of a claim limitation requiring a “cavity” in a locking mechanism.
ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Noting that the adage “If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again” does not apply to lawsuits, the Appellate Court of Maryland affirmed both the Maryland Insurance Administration’s (MIA) finding that the appellant was collaterally estopped from relitigating his insurers’ duty to defend him against an underlying land dispute filed against him and his wife by their neighbors and a lower court’s ruling to strike his second amended complaint when he attempted to add civil claims to his petition for judicial review of the MIA’s conclusion.
PHILADELPHIA — Concluding that for the purposes of Paycheck Protection Act (PPP) loan forgiveness, payments by a business to independent contractors should not be included in the calculation of the business’s payroll costs, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel unanimously reversed a ruling by a Pennsylvania federal court that the Small Business Administration (SBA) acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying forgiveness for a portion of a business’s PPP loan.
RICHMOND, Va. — Under Armour Inc. has asked the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to reconsider its reversal of a Maryland federal court’s grant of the petitioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in its directors and officers liability insurers’ lawsuit seeking a declaration that they owe no coverage for underlying investigations brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, shareholder demand letters and a securities class action, contending that “rehearing is exceptionally important because of the strong public policy interest in settlement.”
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a Texas federal judge’s entry of summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Walmart Inc., writing in a nonprecedential Feb. 5 opinion that the plaintiff-appellant technology company could not show that the asserted patent claims were not invalid as abstract.
NEW ORLEANS — A jury before a Louisiana federal judge on Feb. 5 held that an insurer acted in bad faith in its handling of the church insured’s claim arising from Hurricane Ida property damage, concluding that the insurer owes the insured $2,818,230.66 in additional coverage for its claim, $371,265 for the insurer’s bad faith and $371,265 for the insurer’s failure to timely pay.
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court’s order dismissing shareholders’ putative class action alleging that Funko Inc. and certain of its executives violated federal securities laws by issuing misleading statements about the company’s inventory, storage and technology, finding that the plaintiffs pleaded with sufficient particularity factual allegations regarding the falsity of statements concerning existing technology and inventory management.