Newsletter RSS

Mealey's California Section 17200

  • October 06, 2025

    High Court Won’t Review California Bar Of Arbitration In Coinbase Hacking Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 6 denied cryptocurrency exchange operators’ petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a California state court ruling barring enforcement of its arbitration agreement with customers because the customers seek public injunctive relief under California’s unfair competition law (UCL), which the crypto company claimed undermined the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

  • October 03, 2025

    Split Panel Says California Interest Law Not Preempted After High Court Vacatur

    SAN FRANCISCO — A split Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 2 said that it cannot overrule its own precedent holding that the National Bank Act (NBA) does not preempt a California state law requiring a minimum 2% interest on certain mortgage escrow accounts and affirmed a more than $9 million judgment in favor of a class of borrowers, while a dissenting judge said the precedent at issue was “‘effectively overruled’” by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • October 02, 2025

    N.Y. Plaintiffs Dismissed From False Discount Pricing Suit Against Ralph Lauren

    NEW YORK — A New York federal judge granted in part two clothing companies’ motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit against them for deceptively advertising their products with false discounts, finding that state law claims on behalf of New York consumers were inadequately pleaded but denying the motion as to claims on behalf of Oregon and California consumers, including for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • October 02, 2025

    $2M Settlement Of California Federal Wage-And-Hour Class Action Gets Final OK

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California granted final approval to a $2 million class action settlement to resolve long-running claims that the owners of facilities that supply forage products violated the California Labor Code and the California unfair competition law (UCL) by, among other things, failing to pay nonexempt employees minimum and overtime wages and failing to comply with rest and meal period requirements.

  • September 30, 2025

    $49.25M Settlement OK’d In College Baseball Coaches’ Conspiracy To Deny Pay Suit

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal judge in California granted final approval of a $49.25 million settlement for a class of college “volunteer” baseball coaches who accused the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and its member schools of conspiring to ensure they were paid nothing for what they said were full-time jobs.

  • September 30, 2025

    Bench Trial Set To Determine Settlement Amount In ‘Free Trial Scam’ Class Suit

    SAN DIEGO — A federal magistrate judge in California determined that a bench trial will commence on Oct. 20 to determine the amount of a class settlement between consumers and a group of defendants referred to as the “Konnektive defendants” alleged to have provided software and other services used in a “free trial scam.”

  • September 29, 2025

    Judge Partly Dismisses Trafficking Victim’s Suit Against PornHub Owners, Visa

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on Sept. 26 issued two rulings, partly granting a motion to dismiss filed by owners and operators of pornography website PornHub and a separate motion to dismiss filed by Visa Inc., which processes payments for PornHub, both of which were accused of violating sex-trafficking laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by monetizing child sex abuse material (CSAM) made of the plaintiff while she was a minor.

  • September 29, 2025

    Judge Denies Motion To Dismiss Class Claims Against Protein Shake Makers

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge, after a hearing, denied a motion to dismiss a consumer’s putative class action lawsuit accusing a protein shake maker and its parent company of misrepresenting the amounts of protein, sugar and carbohydrates in their protein shakes in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL), writing that defense arguments about products the consumer did not purchase can be addressed at the class certification stage.

  • September 29, 2025

    Justice Kagan Seeks Response To Google Stay Request In Epic Games Antitrust Suit

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan on Sept. 26 requested a response to an application filed by Google LLC and related entities seeking a partial stay of a permanent injunction that Google says “completely” overhauls its app store, the Google Play Store (Play), pending disposition of Google’s petition for a writ of certiorari in an antitrust suit filed against it by Epic Games Inc. over Google’s removal of Epic’s Fortnite game from the Google Play Store.

  • September 26, 2025

    Consumers’ Attorney Fees Theory Doesn’t Create Jurisdiction, 9th Circuit Says

    SAN FRANCISCO — Writing that consumers would need to incur $4.3 billion in attorney fees to meet the jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel vacated a lower court’s dismissal on the merits of the consumers’ putative class action against the maker of Kleenex-brand “Wet Wipes” for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and on remand directed dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

  • September 26, 2025

    OnlyFans Defendant Says Hagens Berman Downplays AI Briefing Errors

    LOS ANGELES — Website company Elite Creators LLC urged a federal judge to impose strict sanctions for Hagens Berman’s use of artificial intelligence in a California unfair competition law and false advertising class action related to OnlyFans, saying the plaintiffs’ response to an order to show cause downplays the scope and impact of the errors.

  • September 25, 2025

    Magistrate Judge Recommends Partly Dismissing Deceptive Toddler Drink Label Suit

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California federal magistrate judge recommended granting in part and denying in part a toddler drink maker’s motion to dismiss a putative class lawsuit accusing it of deceptively labeling and marketing a toddler drink by using nutrient content claims that are prohibited for children under the age of 2 by U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws.

  • September 22, 2025

    Minors Sue Disney Over Data Collection On Videos For Children

    LOS ANGELES — Three minors filed a putative class action in California state court accusing two Disney companies of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by failing to designate certain YouTube videos as “for kids” and collecting information about those viewers, which was also the subject of a recent $10 million settlement by Disney with the Federal Trade Commission.

  • September 19, 2025

    Final Approval Given To $20 Million Global Settlement Of Fortra Data Breach MDL

    MIAMI — Five months after a Florida federal judge preliminarily approved a $20 million global settlement of a multidistrict litigation over a 2023 data breach experienced by users of a file-transfer program, he granted final approval to the settlement, thus resolving all remaining claims against software firm Fortra LLC, its customers and their clients by class members who claim that their personally identifiable information (PII) was compromised in the cyberattack.

  • September 19, 2025

    PornHub Investors, Hedge Fund Lenders Dismissed From Woman’s Trafficking Suit

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge in two orders dismissed with prejudice claims brought against hedge funds that lent money to MindGeek S.a.r.l., the company that owns and operates pornography website Pornhub, and claims against former partial owners of MindGeek, in a lawsuit brought by a woman accusing MindGeek and its affiliates of violating sex-trafficking laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by monetizing child sex abuse material (CSAM) that was made while she was a minor.

  • September 17, 2025

    Weight Loss Company Loses Motion To Dismiss Trademark Infringement Case

    SAN DIEGO — The manufacturer of Ozempic, Wegovy and Rybelsus, fended off a motion to dismiss after a California federal judge found that a weight loss company facing claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition did not show that its application of the trademarks was within the nominative fair use doctrine.

  • September 17, 2025

    Data Breach Suit Against Casino Mostly Survives Dismissal

    LAS VEGAS — The operator of a casino that was hit by a data breach in 2024 saw its motion to dismiss putative class privacy, negligence and unfair competition claims mostly denied by a Nevada federal judge, who found that a group of customers and former employees adequately alleged most of their claims and supported them with assertions of cognizable injuries.

  • September 17, 2025

    Parties Reach Settlement To Resolve All Remaining Claims In Reinsurance Dispute

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — The two remaining parties in a suit involving reinsurance and related agreements notified a California federal court that they have reached a final settlement, resolving all outstanding claims and providing for the distribution of funds held by the court.

  • September 16, 2025

    Judge Partly Grants Certification In Suit Over Origin Of ‘Japanese’ Alcohol

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge on Sept. 15 granted a consumer’s motion to certify a class seeking injunctive relief against a U.S. company accused of marketing Japanese sake in a manner that would deceive consumers into believing that it is imported from Japan when it is actually manufactured in California in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) but refused to certify a class seeking damages.

  • September 16, 2025

    Judge Certifies New York Class, Denies California Class In Elderberry Extract Suit

    SAN DIEGO — A California federal judge granted a motion to certify a New York state class accusing the maker of a dietary supplement that contains elderberry extract of deceiving consumers with misleading label statements, denied the motion as to a California class bringing claims for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) because the claims are barred due to a previous California suit, and denied a defense motion to exclude the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses.

  • September 16, 2025

    $95 Million Settlement Of Siri Eavesdropping Class Action Gets Final Approval

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A California federal judge gave a final OK to a $95 million settlement of a six-year-old class action accusing Apple Inc. of collecting unauthorized recordings of Apple device users via its Siri digital assistant, deeming the settlement “fair, adequate, and reasonable.”

  • September 15, 2025

    California Attorney Must Pay $10K For AI Hallucinations In Employment Appeal

    LOS ANGELES — A California appellate panel on Sept. 12 said it is the first court in the state to address an attorney using AI and filing briefs containing “fake legal authority” and ordered the lawyer to pay $10,000 in sanctions for filing two briefs written with “AI tools” in an unsuccessful appeal of summary judgment granted in favor of a company and its owner on her claims for retaliation, termination and violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 15, 2025

    San Francisco City Attorney Settles Hospital Rankings Dispute With Publisher

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Office of San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu announced a settlement with U.S. News & World Report L.P. under which the publisher will disclose on its website payments from hospitals that are included in its “Best Hospitals” ranking, following litigation between the parties over U.S. News’ alleged violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • September 11, 2025

    California Seeks $1.1M In Penalties Against Flavored Vape Seller

    FRESNO, Calif. — A California federal judge discharged an order to show cause why the CEO of a vape retail company should not be sanctioned after the director updated his address on the docket, one day after the California Attorney General’s Office moved for summary judgment seeking a more than $1.1 million fine against the CEO and his company for violating federal and state tobacco laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by selling disposable flavored vape products without a license or youth restrictions.

  • September 10, 2025

    Judge: OnlyFans Class Must Show Why AI Errors Don’t Require Sanctions

    LOS ANGELES — Plaintiffs in a California unfair competition law and advertising class action challenging the use of professional chatters on the OnlyFans site must show why they shouldn’t be sanctioned after their counsel submitted a quartet of briefs with artificial intelligence-created errors, a federal judge in California said in an order to show cause.