Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

  • June 11, 2025

    Conservative Social Media User’s Suit Over ‘Political’ Ban From Sites Dismissed

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A California federal judge on June 10 dismissed with prejudice a conservative activist’s lawsuit against social media companies Meta Platforms Inc. and X Corp. Inc. for banning her accounts on their platforms based on what she contended were constitutionally protected political statements, finding that the platforms as publishers are immune from her claims for violation of her free speech rights and of California’s unfair competition law (UCL).

  • June 11, 2025

    Mandate Issued In 9th Circuit Ruling Affirming Judgment In In Social Media Dispute

    PASADENA, Calif. — In a case on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a mandate regarding its ruling affirming a lower court’s judgment for parents who sued two members of a school district’s board of trustees the parents said violated their First Amendment rights by blocking the parents from the trustees’ public social media accounts.

  • June 10, 2025

    Magistrate Approves $7.25M Settlement Of Patreon Privacy Violation Claims

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal magistrate judge granted a motion for final approval of a $7.25 million settlement to resolve claims that Patreon Inc. illegally shared its users’ video-viewing data with social media company Meta Platforms Inc., including more than $2.1 million in attorney fees, and rejected as invalid more than 900 opt-outs filed on behalf of class members by a third-party “recovery company.”

  • June 06, 2025

    D.C. Circuit Upholds FCC Denial Of Application For $1.3 Billion Broadband Subsidy

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling by the Federal Communications Commission declining to review an FCC bureau’s rejection of a broadband provider’s application for an award of $1.3 billion in subsidies to build out rural broadband networks after the provider received the award in a reverse auction subject to final approval, finding that the “denial was not arbitrary and capricious.”

  • June 06, 2025

    5th Circuit Affirms Dismissal For No Jurisdiction In Masons Online Defamation Row

    NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a tortious interference and defamation dispute between a masonic lodge and its conference regarding the suspension of the lodge’s charter and the conference’s alleged defamatory social media posts about the lodge, finding that the lower court correctly dismissed the suit for lack of personal jurisdiction.

  • June 05, 2025

    9th Circuit Denies Apple’s Bid To Stay Injunction In App Dispute With Epic Games

    SAN FRANCISCO — In a two-page order issued June 4, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a motion filed by Apple Inc. to stay an injunction pending appeal in an antitrust dispute with Epic Games Inc. over a lower court ruling that requires Apple to permit app developers to inform users of methods for making in-app purchases (IAPs) outside of the company’s App Store.

  • June 04, 2025

    Granting Injunction, Judge Finds Fla. Social Media Law ‘Likely Unconstitutional’

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Deeming “likely unconstitutional” a Florida law that seeks to regulate access to certain social media platforms for Florida youth, a Florida federal judge on June 3 granted a preliminary injunction to two nonprofit organizations representing internet-based companies seeking to stop enforcement of certain provisions of the law, finding that “[t]he balance of the equities and the public interest . . . favor preliminary relief.”

  • June 03, 2025

    Panel Affirms $475K Judgment For Personal Injury Plaintiff In Wire Fraud ‘Scam’

    SAN DIEGO — In what it said was a case of first impression, a California appellate court affirmed a lower court’s judgment for a personal injury plaintiff in a dispute with a restaurant and its employees over who bears the risk of loss when an “imposter” caused a $475,000 personal injury settlement to be wired to an unknown third party instead of the plaintiff, finding that evidence shows that “red flags should have alerted” the restaurant and the employees “to the fraud, and that there were none that should have alerted plaintiff.”

  • June 03, 2025

    Judge Tosses Online Retailer’s Complaints Suit Against Amazon, Finds CDA Immunity

    GREENBELT, Md. — A Maryland federal judge on June 2 dismissed without prejudice a negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress suit against Amazon.com Services LLC filed by an event planning company and its purported owner regarding complaints they received for an unaffiliated Amazon retailer that incorrectly listed the plaintiffs’ contact information, finding that Amazon is immune from the emotional distress claim pursuant to the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

  • June 02, 2025

    8th Circuit Affirms Injunction Denial In Suit Over Alleged Stolen Computer Data

    ST. LOUIS —  The Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 30 affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying an employer’s motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to enforce an employment agreement’s restrictive covenants in a suit accusing former employees of breach of contract and violations of state and federal trade secret laws for allegedly taking trade secret information from their work computers, finding that the former employer is not likely “to succeed on the merits of the case.”

  • May 30, 2025

    Amici Urge Review Of 9th Circuit Affirmance Of Dismissal Of Suit Against Meta

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Amici curiae filed briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court urging review of a petition filed by a man seeking certiorari for a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling affirming dismissal of his complaint and claims that Facebook Inc. (now Meta Platforms Inc.) destroyed his social network pages and his related business income by removing posts that purportedly violated its community standards.

  • May 30, 2025

    Judge Grants Dismissal Motion In Coverage Row Related To Social Media Addiction MDL

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A California federal judge granted insurers’ motion to dismiss a breach of contract suit filed against them by Meta Platforms Inc. and Instagram LLC over the insurers’ purported duty to defend and indemnify the insureds in a product liability multidistrict ligation regarding the alleged addictive qualities for adolescents of several of the largest social media platforms, finding that dismissal in favor of a suit in Delaware is appropriate under the first-to-file rule.

  • May 30, 2025

    Justice Denies TikTok Motion To Dismiss In New York Suit Over ‘Addictive’ Harm

    NEW YORK — A New York justice on May 29 denied in part and granted in part TikTok LLC and related entities’ motion to dismiss in a suit filed against TikTok and the entities by the New York attorney general’s office alleging fraud and deception for “addictive” harm incurred by youth using the social media platform, denying dismissal of the counts in the complaint but striking complaint allegations related to misrepresenting compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act and misrepresenting TikTok’s relationship with the Chinese government.

  • May 29, 2025

    9th Circuit Affirms Order Denying Judgment For Online Service In Antitrust Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s ruling denying an online pharmacy monitoring service’s motion for summary judgment based upon a lack of standing in a suit against it alleging Sherman Act violations for a purported group boycott, finding that there is standing under the Clayton Act “for injuries suffered by” a “business or property interest when competing in a legitimate market, even if such business or property interest has been attained by unlawful means.”

  • May 28, 2025

    Supreme Court Won’t Hear Law Firm’s Challenge To Ad-Buying Trademark Opinion

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 27 decided that it would not hear a law firm’s challenge to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ affirmation of a judge’s finding that a defendant law firm’s purchasing of a competitor’s trademark in Google keyword ads was not trademark infringement, turning away the plaintiff-petitioner’s contention that the Ninth Circuit’s likelihood-of-confusion analysis conflicts with that used in other circuits.

  • May 28, 2025

    DOL Rescinds Guidance That Advised ‘Extreme Care’ On Crypto In 401(k) Plans

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — March 2022 guidance that directed fiduciaries to use “extreme care before they consider adding a cryptocurrency option to a 401(k) plan's investment menu for plan participants” has been rescinded, federal regulators announced May 28. 

  • May 28, 2025

    Fortnite Developer Seeks To Compel Arbitration Of Youth’s ‘FOMO’ Suit

    SAN FRANCISCO — Epic Games Inc., the developer of “Fortnite,” on May 27 filed a motion in California federal court seeking to compel arbitration of a minor’s putative class action accusing it of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by using “deceptive countdown timers” and minors’ “fear of missing out” (FOMO) to incentivize their purchases of in-game items.

  • May 23, 2025

    9th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments In Apple Watch Heart Rate Tracking Dispute

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in an appeal of a district court order granting Apple’s Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on claims that it violated federal antitrust law and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) by impairing a competitor’s heart rate tracking app tailored for the Apple Watch to monopolize the market.

  • May 22, 2025

    SAG-AFTRA Files Charge Against Epic Games-‘Owned’ LLC Over Darth Vader AI Use

    LOS ANGELES — Screen Actors Guild and the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) filed a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) charge against Llama Productions LLC, a company it says is owned by Epic Games Inc., accusing Llama of not bargaining in good faith by choosing “to replace the work of human performers with [artificial intelligence] A.I. technology without providing notice to the union” regarding the A.I. use of the voice of actor James Earl Jones for Star Wars character, Darth Vader, in Epic’s video game, Fortnite.

  • May 22, 2025

    Justice Denies TikTok Motion To Compel In New York Suit Over ‘Addictive’ Harm

    NEW YORK — A New York justice denied TikTok LLC and related entities’ motion to compel production of documents by state agencies in a suit filed against TikTok by the New York attorney general’s office alleging fraud and deception for “addictive” harm incurred by youth using the social media platform, finding that pursuant to state law, TikTok is “statutorily precluded” from compelling the attorney general to provide discovery from state agencies.

  • May 22, 2025

    Judge Compels Arbitration Of Suit Against ‘Social’ Gambling Site Operator

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge on May 21 granted a Cypriot gambling website operator’s motion to compel arbitration of claims brought against it by a man with a gambling addiction who alleges that the website is operated in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA).

  • May 20, 2025

    Judge Denies Attorney Fees To Activist Who Posted Hunter Biden Files

    SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on May 19 denied a motion for attorney fees filed by a conservative activist and his organization against whom Hunter Biden had brought claims for violation of computer fraud laws and California’s unfair competition law (UCL) after they posted data from Biden’s laptop online, finding after the voluntary dismissal of Biden’s claims that fees were not warranted.

  • May 16, 2025

    Magistrate Grants Discovery Motion In Trademark Row Involving Web-Based Retailers

    DENVER — A Colorado magistrate judge granted a fencing company’s motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery in its trademark infringement suit against web-based retailers, finding that the jurisdictional discovery information sought is necessary for the court to determine whether it has personal jurisdiction over the defendants.

  • May 16, 2025

    Judge Tosses Defamation Suit Against Meta, Says Opinions Are Not Defamation

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge dismissed with prejudice a suit against Meta Platforms Inc. and multiple parties filed by a man who said he was defamed by posts made about him in the Are We Dating the Same Guy? Facebook group, finding that the man failed to state a claim for relief and that the comments made about the man “were subjective opinions” and “cannot amount to defamation.”

  • May 15, 2025

    Judgment Granted For Def Con In Defamation Suit Over Cybersecurity Conference Ban

    SEATTLE — A Washington federal magistrate judge granted summary judgment to the organizer of the Def Con cybersecurity and hacking conference, Def Con Communications Inc., and its founder, Jeff Moss, in a suit accusing them of defamation related to transparency statements announcing a ban from the conference of a company for alleged violations of the conference code of conduct by its founder, finding that the misconduct implications in the statements “are true and were true at the time of publication, and that truth is a complete defense to a defamation action.”