( April 3, 2026, 9:00 AM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — As oral argument approaches in a U.S. Supreme Court case where the petitioner was convicted of armed robbery through cell phone location evidence obtained through a geofence warrant that he argues was unconstitutional, the U.S. government filed a merits brief contending in part that the petitioner’s “dramatic expansion of the Fourth Amendment would stifle developments in . . . evolving areas of law and handicap the investigation of major crimes,” and amici curiae including local government organizations made similar arguments....