Mealey's Attorney Fees
-
January 23, 2026
Supplement Patent Owner To High Court: Federal Circuit Wrongly Affirmed Sanctions
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A patent-holding company tells the U.S. Supreme Court that the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals was wrong to affirm a Florida federal judge’s entry of sanctions against it, in part because the appeals court did not rely on the District Court’s primary bad faith finding.
-
January 23, 2026
Magistrate Says Insurer’s Subrogation Claim Against Contractor Should Proceed
AUSTIN, Texas — A federal magistrate judge in Texas recommended that a district court deny a construction company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a case its insurer brought against it seeking to recover attorney fees it paid in defending subcontractors in an arbitration regarding allegedly negligent hotel designs and construction, finding that the insurer exclusively paid defense cost claims.
-
January 22, 2026
Nevada Supreme Court OKs $161K Attorney Fee Award In Dance Crew Dispute
CARSON CITY, Nev. — The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s award of approximately $161,000 in attorney fees and costs to a founding member of a dance crew who won a dispute over the distribution of proceeds from a separate settlement after his offer to settle the proceeds dispute was rejected by an employee of the crew and his company, but reversed $138,000 in damages for a tax penalty that was improperly awarded.
-
January 22, 2026
Shipping Investor Seeks Attorney Fees For ‘Hidden’ Fraud Evidence In Arbitration
NEW YORK — A shipping investor filed a motion in New York federal court for sanctions and an award of attorney fees against Reed Smith LLP, Greenberg Traurig LLP and an attorney at each firm, writing that they improperly sought confirmation of a JAMS award worth more than $102 million despite allegedly “knowing” that it “had been obtained through fraud” and that a judge vacated due to “false testimony.”
-
January 22, 2026
$5.48 Million Settlement Of Suit Over Analytics Firm’s Data Breach Approved
NEWARK, N.J. — Seven months after preliminarily approving a settlement of $5,482,500 to resolve a consolidated class action over claims stemming from a 2023 data breach experienced by a health-oriented data management firm, a New Jersey federal magistrate judge granted final approval to the agreement as being “fair, reasonable, and adequate.”
-
January 22, 2026
Iowa High Court Affirms Ruling Denying Attorney Fee Award In Rental Trespass Row
DES MOINES, Iowa — The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a lower court ruling upholding a small claims court decision awarding rental costs in a dispute over trespass between a landlord and tenants but declining to award attorney fees to the tenants, finding that the record supports the lower court’s damages determination and the lower court correctly found that Iowa landlord-tenant law related to attorney fees does not apply in this case.
-
January 20, 2026
Radiology Provider Settles Data Breach Class Claims For $1.5M Plus Monitoring, Fees
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — A radiology service provider will pay $1.5 million to those patients whose data were accessed during a cyberattack who can demonstrate loss, will provide medical data monitoring valued at more than $186 million to all class members and will pay class counsel $2.85 million, according to a settlement agreement granted final approval by a Florida judge.
-
January 16, 2026
$30 Million Settlement Of Kids’ Privacy Suit Against Google Gets Final OK
SAN JOSE, Calif. — About four months after preliminarily approving a $30 million agreement that would settle invasion of privacy claims against YouTube LLC and Google LLC (Google, collectively) for the purported collection of minors’ personally identifiable information (PII) in violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), a California federal magistrate judge granted a final approval motion, ending the more than six-year-old class action.
-
January 16, 2026
Fla. Panel Reverses Order As To Attorney Fees In Settlement Agreement With FIGA
MIAMI — A Florida appeals court reversed and remanded a lower court order requiring the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) to pay the full amount of a settlement agreement between homeowners and their now-insolvent insurer in a hurricane damage coverage dispute, finding that the lower court erred in requiring FIGA to pay the attorney fee portion of the settlement agreement because it was not part of a covered claim pursuant to Florida law regarding FIGA.
-
January 16, 2026
Tribunal Awards $556K For Azerbaijan Ignoring Travel Ban Order
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) published a tribunal’s interim order awarding U.K. investors more than $556,000 in attorney fees and costs incurred in their unsuccessful attempts to obtain Azerbaijan’s compliance with a prior tribunal order requiring it to lift its travel ban on a dead investor’s son.
-
January 15, 2026
Judge Finds Fraud In Shipping Arbitration, Vacates Award And Issues Sanctions
NEW YORK — A New York federal judge vacated a JAMS arbitral award worth more than $102 million after finding the original award-creditors “purposefully presented false testimony at the arbitration” regarding a dispositive issue in the dispute, issued sanctions against them for failure to comply with discovery orders and ordered them to pay attorney fees, saying their former law firm “crossed” a “line” in the arbitration without finding it “complicit in its clients’ perjury.”
-
January 14, 2026
Washington Federal Judge Trims Attorney Fees In Remanded ERISA Disability Case
SEATTLE — Addressing an opposed request for attorney fees totaling $239,390 in a long-term disability (LTD) benefits case involving long COVID that was remanded to the administrator for full consideration because of a “substantial” procedural error, a Washington federal judge on Jan. 13 reduced the hours and the blended hourly rate, concluding that the appropriate fee award in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act case is $112,050.
-
January 14, 2026
Judge Remands Suit Against Insurer For Data Sharing, Denies Attorney Fee Request
SAN FRANCISCO — Writing that a dental insurer engaged in “dubious” tactics by “removing based on federal jurisdiction then turning around and challenging federal standing,” a California federal judge denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss and instead remanded a putative class action against it for allegedly sharing insureds’ online data without consent, but denied the plaintiff’s request to consider attorney fees.
-
January 13, 2026
Risk Pool Rebuts Reinsurer’s Dissolution Claim In Arbitration Dispute
NEW YORK — An intergovernmental risk pool told a New York federal court that a reinsurer baselessly alleged that it was dissolved without notice when the reinsurer urged the court to rule on pending cross-petitions in an arbitration awards dispute involving attorney fees and whether there was a probability or a possibility of an excess judgment in an underlying case.
-
January 13, 2026
Insurer Cannot Recoup More Than $721K In Attorney Fees, Costs, Judge Says
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A California federal judge partially denied an insurer’s motion to recoup more than $721,000 in attorney fees, costs and interest deposited with the court in a coverage dispute over environmental contamination costs owed to an insured after determining that the insurer failed to show that the fees and costs billed by the insureds are unreasonable.
-
January 12, 2026
High Court Denies Cigar Maker’s Petition For Review Of Voluntary Dismissal Issue
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 12 denied a cigar maker’s petition for a writ of certiorari challenging the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ latest ruling on a long-running dispute between it and rival tobacco companies over antitrust and breach of contract claims, in which the petitioner argued that the Ninth Circuit “deepened” a circuit split by hearing an appeal in which the respondents allegedly “manufactured finality.”
-
January 09, 2026
Idaho High Court Blocks HOA Short-Term Rental Restriction, Denies Attorney Fees
BOISE, Idaho — The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment issued in favor of property owners, holding that a state statute prohibits a homeowners association from enforcing a short-term rental restriction adopted without the property owners’ express written consent and rejecting the association’s argument that the restriction later bound subsequent purchasers; the Idaho high court also declined to award attorney fees to either party after determining the appeal raised an issue of first impression and was not frivolous.
-
January 08, 2026
Insurer’s Rescission Bid Denied In Coverage Dispute As To Underlying Litigation
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A New York federal judge denied an insurer’s motion for summary judgment seeking rescission of policies due to a purported material misrepresentation in a policy application and a determination that the insurer has no duty to defend in underlying personal injury litigation involving a property owner and a property manager, finding “that there was no misrepresentation” in the application and that there is no dispute that a duty to defend is covered under the policies.
-
January 07, 2026
Judge Orders Author Who Accused Netflix Of Copying Book To Pay Fees
ORLANDO, Fla. — A Florida federal judge granted a request for attorney fees from Netflix Inc. and related entities, calling an author’s claims that the 2021 disaster comedy “Don’t Look Up” copied elements of two of his novels “objectively unreasonable, if not frivolous.”
-
January 07, 2026
Judge Nixes Fees And Costs Deal For More Than $7.5M In Pension Case, For Now
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — Citing “the uncertainty of the appellate relief and operation of the agreement,” a Kansas federal judge on Jan. 6 denied without prejudice the parties’ joint stipulation that “upon affirmance of the District Court’s decision that does not reduce the amount of the judgment” the defendants would pay $7,108,254.82 in attorney fees and $449,437.86 in costs plus interest in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action where labor union members whose early retirement benefits were stopped or denied because of non-boilermaker work largely prevailed following a bench trial.
-
January 07, 2026
6th Circuit Vacates Ruling Awarding Fees For Attorneys, Expert Witnesses
CINCINNATI — Resolving cross-appeals, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court “abused its discretion in disallowing, as a matter of law, any fees for work performed in separate proceedings and in awarding expert witness fees under” Title 42 U.S. Code Section 1988(c) in a long-running inverse condemnation case that the owner of an industrial property filed against the city of Detroit.
-
January 06, 2026
$150M Settlement Approved In Consolidated Action Over Defective EV Battery
DETROIT — A federal judge in Michigan has granted final approval to a $150 million settlement that will resolve consolidated litigation alleging that the batteries in Chevrolet Bolt electronic vehicles for model years 2017 to 2022 had a defect that allowed them to overheat, finding that “the settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable; the attorneys’ fees and expense reimbursement and service awards are reasonable; and the settlement is in the best interest of the class as a whole.”
-
January 06, 2026
Default Judgment Recommended Against Pharmacy In FCA ‘Fraudulent’ Prescription Row
BROOKLYN, N.Y. — A New York federal magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation advising entering default judgment against a pharmacy in a relator’s qui tam suit accusing the pharmacy of violating the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and related New York state law by participating in a “massive fraudulent prescription billing scheme” regarding the submission of false claims to government insurers, finding that the relator “has alleged all of the elements of a plausible claim under the FCA” against the pharmacy, which has failed to appear.
-
January 06, 2026
6th Circuit Affirms Fees To Morissette In Frivolous IP Claim Suit
CINCINNATI — A Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a Michigan federal judge’s order that a pro se plaintiff-appellant must pay singer-songwriter Alanis Morissette and a related entity more than $3,000 in attorney fees and costs, finding that the appellant abandoned his challenge to attorney fees and failed to show that he should be allowed to amend his complaint accusing Morissette of stealing the songs on her record “Jagged Little Pill” from him.
-
January 05, 2026
9th Circuit Grants Appellate Attorney Fees In Supplement Counterfeiting Row
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals granted a motion from a supplement maker and its founder for appellate attorney fees against defendant-appellant entities that were accused of counterfeiting the appellees’ registered trademark; in October, the panel affirmed a California federal judge’s entry of $4 million judgment and award of nearly $5.3 million in attorney fees after the judge entered default judgment against the defendant-appellants.