Mealey's Class Actions

  • March 24, 2025

    $4M Deal Proposed To Settle Lawsuit Challenging ESOP Transaction

    PEORIA, Ill. — An employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) lawsuit would be resolved on a class basis for $4 million, according to a motion for preliminary settlement approval that the named plaintiff filed in Illinois federal court; the development comes as briefing remains suspended in an interlocutory appeal concerning whether the plaintiff can pursue planwide relief in a representative capacity given that class certification was denied due to intraclass conflict.

  • March 21, 2025

    Amended Class Action Alleges Dental Floss Contains Multiple PFAS Chemicals

    NEW YORK — A plaintiff has filed a second amended class complaint in New York federal court arguing that dental floss made by Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) contains multiple chemicals that fit under the classification of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) based on direct testing of the product, which renders P&G’s claim that its products are healthy “false and misleading.”

  • March 20, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Fraud Class Action Against Amazon For Failure To Plead Scienter

    SEATTLE — A federal judge in Washington dismissed investors’ consolidated securities fraud class action against Amazon.com Inc. and several of its executives, finding that they failed to adequately plead scienter when bringing claims that the company made misrepresentations regarding the exploitation of third-party sellers and misrepresentations about Amazon’s infrastructure and fulfillment capacity.

  • March 20, 2025

    Wiretapping, Chatbot Class Suit Against Kroger Tossed As Lacking ‘Plausible’ Claim

    LOS ANGELES — A California federal judge dismissed a putative class action suit against The Kroger Co., a U.S.-based company that operates retail grocery stores, for alleged violations of California’s wiretapping statute by using third-party software to purportedly eavesdrop on chat-based conversations on Kroger’s website, finding that the plaintiff’s “allegations do not render plausible her claim of violation” of the wiretapping statute.

  • March 20, 2025

    Progressive, Insureds Settle Actual Vehicle Value Class Lawsuit For $48M

    NEW YORK — A federal judge in New York granted final approval of a $48 million class settlement between insureds and vehicle insurance companies, ending a lawsuit accusing the auto insurers of paying less than the actual cash value of vehicles deemed total losses.

  • March 20, 2025

    NBA Asks Supreme Court To Decide If VPPA Harm Requires Public Disclosure

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Appealing a ruling by the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that revived a putative class claim against it for violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (VPPA), the National Basketball Association (NBA), in a petition for certiorari, asks the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify the standards for when a plaintiff has standing to bring a VPPA claim.

  • March 19, 2025

    Judge Rebuffs Appointments Challenge In ERISA Benefits Suit Over Spinoff

    PHILADELPHIA — After conducting a bench trial in an Employee Retirement Income Security Act class action over corporate restructuring that affected retirement benefits and issuing a mixed December ruling as to liability, a Pennsylvania federal judge on March 18 denied a motion in which the defendants sought emergency relief regarding his appointment of “an independent technical adviser on ERISA” and a special master as to remedies.

  • March 19, 2025

    9th Circuit Vacates Remand Order In Wage Class Suit Against Funeral Home

    PASADENA, Calif. — A trial court judge failed to properly evaluate an employer’s violation-rate assumption in a wage-and-hour putative class suit, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, vacating an order sending the case back to state court.

  • March 19, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Suit Against GEICO After Parties File Joint Notice Of Dismissal

    CHICAGO — The same day the parties filed a joint notice of dismissal, an Illinois federal judge dismissed with prejudice insureds’ lawsuit alleging that auto insurers violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act by charging “excessive” premiums during the COVID-19 pandemic that failed to account for a dramatic reduction in driving.

  • March 19, 2025

    9th Circuit Denies Petition In Attorney Fee Challenge After Voluntary Dismissal

    PASADENA, Calif. — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel denied a petition for writ of mandamus filed by consumers who argued that their voluntary dismissal of their class complaint alleging underfill of lower calorie ice cream could not be hinged on their payment of attorney fees to the defendants or limits on refiling.

  • March 19, 2025

    Biometric Privacy Claims Over Neutrogena Online Skin Analysis To Proceed

    TRENTON, N.J. — Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&J) must face putative claims under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), a New Jersey federal judge held, denying the company’s second dismissal motion centering on its online Neutrogena Skin360 skin assessment product.

  • March 18, 2025

    Camp Lejeune Plaintiff Wants ‘Conspicuous Notice’ Posted On Defendant’s Website

    WHEELING, W.Va. — A woman suing law firms alleging that they engaged in illegal phone calls soliciting clients for mass tort cases relating to toxic water exposure at Camp Lejeune has moved in a West Virginia federal court for approval of a class notice plan and an order from the district court requiring one of the firms to post “conspicuous notice of the lawsuit and a copy of the Class Certification order” in a banner at the top of each page of its website.

  • March 18, 2025

    Costco: Baby Wipes Case Fails Because Studies Do Not Show Harmful Effects Of PFAS

    SAN FRANCISCO — Costco Wholesale Corp. has moved in California to dismiss a class action alleging that Kirkland Signature Baby Wipes contain unsafe levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), arguing that the plaintiffs do not cite “any state or federal regulations prohibiting or restricting the specific substances” at issue and do not point to a single study that purports to find harmful effects from those substances in humans.

  • March 18, 2025

    Consumers Tell High Court Federal Food Laws ‘Expressly Permit’ California Claims

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Two parents filed an opposition brief to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that it should deny a baby food company’s petition for a writ of certiorari challenging a split Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel’s decision allowing the company to be sued for violating California consumer protection laws by allegedly violating federal labeling rules, writing that federal law does not preempt states from adopting “‘identical’” labeling rules.

  • March 18, 2025

    6th Circuit: ‘Inherently Transitory’ Exception Applies To Mooted Bail Class Claims

    CINCINNATI — An arrestee’s putative class claims over having to prove bail bond funding sources prior to being released may have been mooted by his release, but the “inherently transitory” exception applies, a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled, reversing a trial court’s finding of mootness and clarifying “that a class-certification motion need not be pending” for the exception to apply.

  • March 18, 2025

    Settlement With $8.75M Payment Proposed In ERISA Suit Over 401(k) Management

    SAN FRANCISCO — Plaintiffs who sued over allegedly imprudent management of a 401(k) plan have moved in California federal court to certify a settlement class and to request preliminary approval of a deal that would include an $8.75 million payment and other relief.

  • March 18, 2025

    VPPA Claim Over Videos On Scientific American’s Website May Proceed, Judge Rules

    NEW YORK — A Florida man has sufficiently alleged that the owner of Scientific American (SA) violated the Video Protection Privacy Act of 1988 (VPPA) by disclosing videos that he watched on the publication’s website by collecting and sharing users’ personally identifiable information (PII) via Meta Platforms Inc.’s pixel tool, a New York federal judge ruled, denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the putative class complaint.

  • March 17, 2025

    Ex-Employee’s Suit Over Food Wholesaler’s Data Breach Dismissed For Lack Of Injury

    TOPEKA, Kan. — An Oklahoma man’s putative class complaint over a 2023 data breach experienced by his former employer was dismissed without prejudice by a Kansas federal judge, who found that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring negligence and privacy claims, among others, for failing to allege that his personally identifiable information (PII) was actually misused after it was stolen in the breach.

  • March 17, 2025

    Drug Costs Under Employee Health Plan Are Focus Of Another ERISA Suit

    NEW YORK — In an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary duty complaint similar to those filed in two other putative class cases, former and current JPMorgan Chase & Co. employees sued the company and related defendants over the prescription drug part of its health plan, alleging that mismanagement is evident from prices paid to pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) “for many generic drugs that are widely available at drastically lower prices.”

  • March 17, 2025

    Veterans, Government Dismiss ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Suit After Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — Veterans and the federal government filed a joint stipulation of dismissal in a federal court in California in the veterans’ class lawsuit one day after a magistrate judge granted final approval of a class settlement that provides removal of references to sexual orientation from the discharge paperwork of servicemembers discharged under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) and other similar policies.

  • March 17, 2025

    Class Complaint Challenges HUD’s Termination Of 78 Fair Housing Grants

    SPRINGFIELD, Mass. — The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Feb. 27 termination of 78 Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) grants for 66 organizations was carried out for reasons that make no “sense” and has had an “immediate and devastating impact” on the organizations and the communities they serve, four nonprofit fair housing groups allege in a class complaint filed in a federal court in Massachusetts.

  • March 17, 2025

    Federal Government Appeals Order Enjoining Removal Of Immigrant Class

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. government officials filed a notice of appeal on March 15 following a minute order that day by a federal judge in the District of Columbia that provisionally certified a class of immigrants facing removal pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) and enjoined the government from removing member of that class for 14 days or until further order by the court.

  • March 14, 2025

    $299,000 Deal Gets Initial OK In ERISA Suit Over Plan’s Tobacco Surcharge

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge granted preliminary approval to a $299,000 class settlement that would resolve an Employee Retirement Income Security Act suit over annual $1,152 surcharges imposed on about 431 health plan participants who use tobacco.

  • March 13, 2025

    Putative Class Says Girl Scout Cookies Contain Toxic Heavy Metals, Glyphosate

    BROOKLYN, N.Y. — Two women have filed a putative class action in New York federal court against the Girl Scouts of the United States of America alleging that the cookies sold by the organization contain heavy metals, including aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury, as well as glyphosate, which is the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup.

  • March 13, 2025

    GoDaddy’s Deadline Extended For Response To Motion To Appeal Settlement Ruling

    MOBILE, Ala. — A federal judge in Alabama on March 12 set April 3 deadlines for a response from GoDaddy.com LLC to a motion by class representatives to certify for appeal a February order declining enforcement of a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class settlement and for a response from class representatives to GoDaddy’s motion to dismiss claims by a deceased class representative; that order was filed one day after the judge declined to reconsider the February decision and directed GoDaddy to respond to the motion to certify the order for appeal.

Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Mealey's Class Actions archive.