REGIONAL POWERHOUSES
Pennsylvania Powerhouse: Reed Smith
By Rachel Rippetoe
While Reed Smith LLP has no official headquarters in any of its 33 offices around the globe, its founding in Pittsburgh 148 years ago undoubtedly makes Pennsylvania a beloved home base — the BigLaw firm's Pittsburgh and Philadelphia offices are home to its global managing partner and a dozen or so other top firm executives.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LITIGATION
Swedish Video Game Co. Beats Suit Over Compliance Issues
By Katryna Perera
A Pennsylvania federal judge dismissed claims against Evolution AB in a suit claiming the Swedish gaming company misled investors about its growth and that its subsidiaries routinely conducted business with unlicensed customers, finding that the court does not have jurisdiction over Evolution, since it is not "at home" in Pennsylvania.
2 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
THIRD CIRCUIT
3rd Circ. Revives Ex-Lecturer's Suit Over Alt-Right Views
By Dorothy Atkins
The Third Circuit on Monday found school disruptions at the New Jersey Institute of Technology caused by a philosophy lecturer's comments don't outweigh his free speech rights, reversing the school's summary judgment win in the professor's lawsuit alleging NJIT violated his constitutional rights by refusing to renew his contract after his off-campus, alt-right comments drew national attention.
Opinion attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
POLICY & REGULATION
Dems Again Ask NY Ethics Body To Investigate Bove
By Jack Karp
Two Democratic senators filed an updated ethics complaint with the New York State Courts' attorney ethics body against recently confirmed Third Circuit Judge Emil Bove, citing what they called his "quid pro quo deal" to drop criminal charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams and other alleged ethical violations.
Letter attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
DEALS
PEOPLE
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court
By Sydney Price and Jeff Montgomery
Last week at the Delaware Court of Chancery, a bankruptcy administrator for a generic drugmaker formerly known as Teligent was told he can proceed with duty of oversight claims against most former officers and directors of the company, who the administrator said was complicit in the company's collapse. In an opinion, the Court of Chancery cites its 1996 decision In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation, which refined director duties of care and oversight.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|