Bach et al v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:10-cv-00395
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Ajubita Leftwich
 - Bernstein Litowitz
 - Bohrer Brady
 - Butler Snow LLP
 - Clayton Fruge
 - Cohen Placitella
 - Connolly Wells
 - deGravelles & Palmintier
 - Donald L. Beckner & Associates
 - Due Guidry
 - Faruqi & Faruqi
 - Gaudry Ranson
 - Harrell & Nowak
 - Jones Day
 - Kahn Swick
 - King & Spalding
 - Morrow Morrow
 - Neblett Beard
 - Odom & Des Roches
 - Phelps Dunbar
 - Pomerantz LLP
 - Robbins Geller
 - Robbins LLP
 - Robein Urann
 - Squitieri & Fearon
 - Wolf Popper
 
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
- 
						December 21, 2017
						
Firms Get $7.4M In Fees For $44M Medicare Fraud Settlement
Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP and other attorneys will get about $7.4 million in fees for securing a $43.75 million settlement for shareholders who claimed a health care provider and its executives covered up a Medicare fraud scheme that ultimately halved its stock price.
 - 
						June 16, 2017
						
Amedisys Pays $44M To End Investors' Medicare Fraud Suit
Amedisys Inc. has agreed to pay $43.75 million to settle a shareholder suit alleging the health care provider and its top executives hid a Medicare fraud scheme that caused its stock prices to drop by half, ending the case after seven years of litigation and a trip to the Fifth Circuit.
 - 
						August 23, 2016
						
Amedisys Can't Dodge Investor Suit Over Medicare Fraud
A Louisiana federal judge has ruled that Amedysis Inc. investors can proceed with a trimmed version of their proposed class action alleging the health care provider and its top executives hid a Medicare fraud scheme that caused the price of the company's stock to drop by half.
 - 
						July 02, 2012
						
Judge Tosses Medicare Fraud Suit Against Amedisys
A Louisiana federal judge on Thursday granted home health care provider Amedisys Inc.'s motion to dismiss a consolidated class action alleging it and several executives improperly inflated Medicare reimbursements, saying the plaintiffs didn't make a strong case about the purported fraud.