LabMD, Inc. v. The Privacy Institute et al
Case Number:
1:19-cv-00852
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 21, 2020
Williams & Connolly Fights DQ Bid In $150M LabMD Suit
Williams & Connolly LLP told a Virginia federal court that it shouldn't be disqualified from representing Reed Smith LLP in a $150 million malicious prosecution lawsuit brought by LabMD Inc., saying the defunct cancer-screening company, which has pursued a number of similar suits, doesn't have the evidence to back up its motion.
-
March 17, 2020
Williams & Connelly Facing DQ Bid In Reed Smith Suit
Williams & Connolly LLP should be disqualified from representing Reed Smith LLP and an attorney in a $150 million malicious prosecution case brought by LabMD Inc. because a lawyer from the firm consulted with the company before it filed the lawsuit, LabMD has argued in Virginia federal court.
-
February 24, 2020
Reed Smith Wants LabMD's $150M Suit Over FTC Probe Axed
Reed Smith LLP on Monday urged a Virginia federal court to toss allegations by LabMD Inc. that the firm should be partially liable for assisting a scheme that led to a Federal Trade Commission investigation of the company and its eventual shuttering.
-
June 26, 2019
LabMD Names Reed Smith In $150M Suit Over Tiversa Row
LabMD Inc. launched a suit Wednesday seeking more than $150 million from Reed Smith LLP and others, saying the law firm helped cybersecurity company Tiversa Holding Corp. carry out an illegal scheme that led to a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit that put LabMD out of business.