Glazing Employers and Glaziers Union Local #27 Pension and Retirement Fund v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:24-cv-00706

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Securities/Commodities

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Jacqueline Scott Corley

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. June 05, 2026

    IRhythm Inks $45M Deal With Investors In Heart Device Suit

    IRhythm Technologies Inc. investors asked a California federal judge to preliminarily greenlight a $45 million settlement resolving allegations the digital healthcare company inflated stock prices with misrepresentations about its heart-event monitoring device, noting the deal is a favorable result that warrants approval, given the possibility of no recovery. 

  2. February 26, 2026

    IRhythm Investors Say 2021 Goldman Ruling Doesn't Bar Cert.

    IRhythm Technologies investors urged a California federal judge Thursday to certify a class that bought 30 million shares while the digital healthcare company allegedly jacked its stock price with false and misleading statements about a heart-event monitoring device, saying the U.S. Supreme Court's 2021 Goldman price impact ruling doesn't apply.

  3. November 10, 2025

    IRhythm Denied Early Win On Investor Scienter & Loss Claims

    Heart monitor maker iRhythm Technologies cannot get an early win in a proposed investor class action alleging it made misleading disclosures about one of its devices, a San Francisco federal judge has determined.

  4. November 04, 2025

    IRhythm Investors Seek Class Cert. In Heart Device Suit

    Investors in digital healthcare company iRhythm Technologies are seeking certification of a class that bought shares of the company over a roughly two-year period during which it allegedly concealed issues with its Zio AT heart-event monitoring device.

  5. June 04, 2025

    Heart Device Maker iRhythm Gets Investor Claims Trimmed

    A California federal judge has trimmed a class action accusing digital healthcare company iRhythm Technologies of making false and misleading statements about its heart-event monitoring device, finding that the suit does not plausibly plead knowledge of wrongdoing for most individual defendants, among other things.