|
TOP NEWS
Justices Will Weigh FCC's Monetary Penalty Powers
By Christopher Cole
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to take a look at the Federal Communications Commission's authority to issue fines by announcing it would review both a Fifth Circuit ruling in AT&T's favor curtailing the agency's ability to issue fines using its own in-house legal process and a case that Verizon lost in the Second Circuit.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Roundup
Up Next At High Court: Pollution Lawsuits & Trans Athletes
By Katie Buehler
The U.S. Supreme Court will kick off the new year by hearing disputes over the constitutionality of state laws banning transgender female athletes from female-only sports and whether state or federal courts are the proper forum for lawsuits seeking to hold major oil companies accountable for harm caused by their oil production activities along Louisiana's coast.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
BANKING & SECURITIES
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES
IP & TECHNOLOGY
MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT
Sens. Urge App Stores To Ban X, Grok Over Sexual Images
By Allison Grande
A trio of U.S. Senate Democrats are calling on Apple and Google to remove the apps for the social media platform X and the generative artificial intelligence chatbot Grok from their app stores until the owner of these services, Elon Musk, adequately addresses the AI tool's generation of sexually explicit content, including "harmful and likely illegal depictions" of women and children.
Letter attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
SPORTS & BETTING
REAL ESTATE
EMPLOYMENT & BENEFITS
COMPETITION
CONSUMER PROTECTION
PRODUCT LIABILITY
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
IMMIGRATION
WHITE COLLAR
7th Circ. Upholds Ex-Atty's Conviction In Burke Bribery Case
By Celeste Bott
The Seventh Circuit on Friday kept in place the conviction and 32-month prison sentence of a Chicago real estate developer and former attorney for offering legal work to ex-Alderman Edward Burke as a bribe for help with a zoning permit, finding the government presented sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict and arguments to the contrary were "unavailing."
Opinion attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
NATIVE AMERICAN
Alaska Natives Challenge IHS Over Women's Health Services
By Crystal Owens
Two Alaskan corporations are asking a D.C. federal court to compel the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to enter into a funding agreement that they say the Indian Health Service has rejected, arguing the denial threatens vital services to Alaska Natives and American Indians who have long depended on an Anchorage medical center.
Complaint attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CANNABIS
PEOPLE
EXPERT ANALYSIS
Opinion
DHS' Parole Termination Violates APA And Due Process
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s abrupt termination of family reunification parole programs violates both the Administrative Procedure Act and the due process rights of vetted beneficiaries who relied on the government's explicit invitation to wait in the U.S. for an immigrant visa to become available, says Abdoul Konare at Konare Law.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Montana Ruling Reaffirms Record-Based Enviro Analyses
A Montana federal court's recent decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service, vacating permits for logging near Yellowstone National Park, is a reminder that, despite attempts to pare back National Environmental Policy Act reviews, agencies must still properly complete such reviews before projects are approved, say attorneys at ArentFox Schiff.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Roundup
UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London
By Laura Stewart Liberty
This past week in London has seen a collapsed investment firm revive a $15 million dispute with a hedge fund, major Hollywood studios bring an IP claim against the U.K.'s largest internet providers over illegal streaming, and the Department of Health and Social Care sue the law firm and barrister representing it in a pharma competition damages case.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|