January 11, 2022

MILLER et al v. VEITENGRUBER, III et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:22-cv-00130

Court:

New Jersey

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Judge:

Zahid N. Quraishi

Firms

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. September 21, 2022

    NJ Atty Avoids Default Loss In Fla. Couple's Malpractice Suit

    A lawyer's delayed response to a malpractice suit may not make him "a model of diligence," but it wasn't enough to be inexcusable, a New Jersey federal judge ruled in rejecting a couple's default judgment motion against the attorney and his law firm in a case over his alleged failure to prevent the couple's home from being foreclosed.

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login