Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Md. Digital Tax Does Not Violate ITFA, Tax Profs Say

By Maria Koklanaris · September 21, 2021, 6:11 PM EDT

Digital advertising substantially differs from nondigital advertising because of the way the advertising interacts with users, and thus Maryland's taxation of it does not violate a federal law that prohibits discriminatory...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Brief

Case Information

Case Title

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. Lierman

Case Number

1:21-cv-00410

Court

Maryland

Nature of Suit

Constitutional - State Statute

Date Filed

February 18, 2021

Recent Articles By Maria

April 23, 2024
Mich. Tax Rate Cut Was Temporary, Dept. Tells State Justices
April 19, 2024
Dispute Over Taxing Business Inputs Snares Va. Lawmakers
April 18, 2024
Co.'s Shoe Sales Warrant Partial Refund, Ohio Justices Told
April 18, 2024
Ga. Corp., Personal Income Tax Rates Dropping To 5.39%
April 16, 2024
Calif. Assembly Committees To Consider Digital Ad Tax
April 12, 2024
NJ Tax Court Awards Refunds To Web-Based Services Co.
April 09, 2024
Professor In Conn. Says NY Teleworker Tax Can't Reach Him
April 08, 2024
No Tax Cuts Or Hikes In Va. Budget, Youngkin Now Says
April 03, 2024
Calif. Can Tax Gain From Contact Lens Biz Sale, OTA Says
April 03, 2024
Grading State Tax Policy And Judging The 'Dirty 30'