Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Whistleblower Hasn't Proved Retaliation In Tariff Fraud Case

By Kevin Pinner · March 14, 2025, 7:12 PM EDT

A former employee of two defunct footwear companies has not shown her boss fired her for confronting him about a scheme she alleged he ran to lower tariffs on certain shoes,...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

United States of America et al v. GMI Corporation

Case Number

1:16-cv-07216

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))

Date Filed

September 15, 2016

Recent Articles By Kevin

November 03, 2025
Kenya Seeks Input On Regs For Min. Tax, Advance Pricing
November 03, 2025
US, China Agree To Cut Tariffs, Restrictions In Trade Truce
October 31, 2025
OECD Reports Rise In Failed Advance Pricing Agreements
October 31, 2025
OECD Reports Sharp Uptick In Transfer Pricing Dispute Cases
October 31, 2025
Australia Issues Guidance On Public Country-By-Country Law
October 30, 2025
Senate Votes To Ax Global Tariffs, But House Path Blocked
October 29, 2025
Senate Backs Axing Brazil Tariffs, But House Vote Blocked
October 28, 2025
Norway Sees 30% Spike In Crypto Reporting To Tax Authority
October 28, 2025
UN Committee Seeks Feedback On Tax Treaty, Dispute Ideas
October 27, 2025
Cambodia Agrees To Cut Tariffs, Barriers In US Trade Deal