In re Mattel Inc Securities Litigation

Track this case

Case Number:

2:19-cv-10860

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Securities/Commodities

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Mark C. Scarsi

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. May 19, 2022

    Judge Cuts 'Unreasonable' Atty Fee Bid In $98M Mattel Deal

    A California federal judge has granted final approval to a $98 million settlement between investors and toymaker Mattel Inc. and PwC, but slashed the requested $24.5 million in attorney fees, saying it was too high.

  2. May 02, 2022

    Mattel Judge Mulls $24.5M Atty Fee Bid In $98M Investor Deal

    U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi said Monday he will grant final approval of $98 million in settlements resolving investors' claims that Mattel and PwC misled them by understating an income tax expense, but said he's still considering the class counsel's $24.5 million attorney fee bid.

  3. January 19, 2022

    Mattel, Investors Get OK On $98M Deal Over Tax Misstatement

    A California federal judge preliminarily approved a $98 million settlement in a class action brought by investors against Mattel and PwC claiming the companies misled them by understating an income tax expense and conspiring to conceal the error.

  4. November 24, 2021

    Mattel, Investors Cut $98M Deal To End Tax Misstatement Row

    A class of investors accusing Mattel and PwC of misleading them by making a $109 million income tax expense understatement and conspiring to conceal the error urged a California federal judge Wednesday to grant preliminary approval of a $98 million settlement deal.

  5. October 07, 2021

    Mattel Investors Win Class Cert. In $109M Tax Expense Row

    A California federal judge certified a class of investors who have accused Mattel and PwC of misleading them by making a $109 million income tax expense understatement for 2017 and conspiring to conceal the error.

  6. May 03, 2021

    Mattel Investors Seek Class Cert. Over Understated Tax Bill

    Mattel investors asked a California federal judge to grant them class status in their securities suit accusing the toymaker of understating its income tax expenses by $109 million for the 2017 tax year, saying courts routinely grant certification in securities cases involving the common questions they face.

  7. April 21, 2020

    Bernstein Litowitz To Lead Investor Suits Against Mattel, PwC

    A California federal judge on Monday consolidated a pair of proposed class actions accusing Mattel and PwC of misleading investors by understating Mattel's income tax expenses by $109 million for the 2017 tax year, giving Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP the green light to lead the litigation.