Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Inc

  1. November 03, 2022

    3rd Circ. Preview: Nov. Sees Uber Arbitration, Drug Discounts

    The Third Circuit's pre-Thanksgiving menu has the court digging into whether an Uber driver can dodge arbitration of his wage suit and whether drug companies have to offer discount prices to pharmacies that contract with hospitals in impoverished areas.

  2. September 13, 2022

    Uber Shells Out $100M To NJ In Driver Classification Fight

    Uber and a subsidiary have agreed to pay about $100 million in back taxes to resolve a New Jersey agency's allegations they shorted the Garden State on taxes by misclassifying drivers as contractors, Uber confirmed Monday.

  3. July 15, 2022

    Transportation Cases To Watch In 2nd Half Of 2022

    A high court fight that could reshape where companies can be sued, ride-hail drivers' efforts to gain employee status, and administrative challenges to ocean shipping industry practices are among the cases transportation attorneys are watching closely in the latter half of 2022.

  4. July 06, 2022

    7 W&H Cases To Watch For The Rest Of 2022

    Wage and hour litigation in the latter half of 2022 will break ground on issues of first impression, like the compensability of remote work expenses, and contend with foundational issues, such as what constitutes a salary and who should be considered an interstate transportation worker. Here are seven cases to keep an eye on. 

  5. May 03, 2022

    Uber Tells 3rd Circ. That Drivers Can't Bypass Arbitration

    Uber has told the Third Circuit that a federal carveout for interstate transportation workers does not shield drivers from having to arbitrate their long-running wage and hour claims against the ride-hailing giant, saying Uber's valid and enforceable arbitration agreement nullifies this "sideshow" dispute.

  6. March 02, 2022

    Uber Drivers Ask 3rd Circ. To Reinforce Arbitration Shield

    Uber drivers told the Third Circuit that a federal carveout for interstate transportation workers shields them from having to arbitrate their wage and hour claims against the ride-hailing giant, saying New Jersey's chief federal judge committed "prejudicial errors" in ruling otherwise last year.