Johnson & Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. California

  1. February 21, 2023

    High Court Won't Review $302M J&J Fine Appeal

    The U.S. Supreme Court is not going to wade into whether the $302 million penalty a California state court slapped Johnson & Johnson with for misleading consumers about the real risks of its pelvic mesh products is part of a "dangerous" national trend.

  2. January 17, 2023

    Calif. Wants High Court To Toss $302M J&J Mesh Fine Appeal

    The state of California fired back Tuesday against Johnson & Johnson's request that the U.S. Supreme Court review its $302 million court-ordered fine for violating the state's false advertising statute by misleading consumers about the safety of its pelvic mesh products, arguing that the statute isn't unconstitutionally vague.

  3. November 16, 2022

    J&J Tells Justices $302M Mesh Fine Part Of 'Dangerous' Trend

    Johnson & Johnson urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to review its court-ordered $302 million fine for misleading California consumers about the true risks of its pelvic mesh products, arguing the justices must curtail a "dangerous" national trend of vague state statutes governing unfair and deceptive acts and practices.