November 01, 2024
Noble v. Broussard et al
Case Number:
3:24-cv-00630
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation, Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Conliffe Sandmann
- Glancy Prongay
- Grabar Law
- Kaplan Johnson
- Rigrodsky Law
- Skees Law Office
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
October 06, 2025
2 Firms To Lead Humana Investor Suit Over Post-COVID Costs
Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP and The Rosen Law Firm will co-lead consolidated shareholder derivative claims against healthcare giant Humana Inc. alleging its brass made the company downplay the "pent-up demand" that pushed up patient utilization rates on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login