State AGs, Generic Cos. Fight Over Price-Fixing Trial Order

By Matthew Perlman · December 18, 2024, 8:24 PM EST

A contingent of state-level enforcers told a Connecticut federal court there is no need to reconsider prioritizing a sprawling generic drug price-fixing case that involves more than 100 medications over a...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Report

Case Information

Case Title

Connecticut et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al

Case Number

Court

Connecticut

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Date Filed

December 15, 2016

Case Title

Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Case Number

Court

Connecticut

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Date Filed

May 10, 2019

Case Title

Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al

Case Number

Court

Connecticut

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Date Filed

June 10, 2020

Recent Articles By Matthew

June 16, 2025
Ohio Tells 6th Circ. PBM Case Doesn't Target Federal Work
June 13, 2025
Injunction Sought After J&J Unit's Catheter Antitrust Loss
June 12, 2025
Florida, Sandoz Say They've Fixed Generic Drug Price-Fix Deal
June 10, 2025
Health Records Co. Looks To Toss Patient Data Access Case
June 02, 2025
Monthly Merger Review Snapshot
May 23, 2025
FTC Probing Alcon's $430M Lensar Deal
May 15, 2025
Hillrom Says Missing Attachment Could End Antitrust Case
May 14, 2025
Total Vision Reaches Deal Ending VSP Antitrust Case
May 13, 2025
FTC To Keep Focus On Key Sectors, Address Personal Liberty
May 09, 2025
Pathology Lab Urges 8th Circ. Not To Revive Antitrust Claims