January 11, 2022
MILLER et al v. VEITENGRUBER, III et al
Case Number:
3:22-cv-00130
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 21, 2022
NJ Atty Avoids Default Loss In Fla. Couple's Malpractice Suit
A lawyer's delayed response to a malpractice suit may not make him "a model of diligence," but it wasn't enough to be inexcusable, a New Jersey federal judge ruled in rejecting a couple's default judgment motion against the attorney and his law firm in a case over his alleged failure to prevent the couple's home from being foreclosed.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login