Veil Shouldn't Be Pierced To Decode Contracts, Panel Says

By Daniel Ducassi · February 29, 2024, 8:10 PM EST

The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil shouldn't be used to interpret disputed contract terms, a split Colorado appellate panel ruled Thursday, reversing a trial court's award of more than $600,000...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Opinion

Recent Articles By Daniel

March 21, 2024
Judge In Blackstone Lease Row Wants Colo. Justices' Input
February 20, 2024
Landlord Bias Can Be Eviction Defense, Colo. Justices Say
February 09, 2024
Mother, Son Call Truce In Dispute Over Denver Bar Chain
January 19, 2024
Colo. Homeowners Sue County Over Local Airport Operations
January 18, 2024
Colo. Ski Town Should Face Vacation Rental Suit, Group Says
January 11, 2024
Son's Bid To Cut Mom Off From Bar Biz Too Hard To Swallow
January 10, 2024
Ill. City May Be Liable In Own Pollution Suit Against Metal Co.
January 09, 2024
Student Housing Co. Inks $1M Settlement With Colo. AG
January 01, 2024
Colorado Cases To Watch In 2024
December 21, 2023
Nonprofit Wants $24M Golf Course Sold For $259K Judgments